Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1762969653

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-142432

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Place of publication:: Chicago

Publisher:: A. W. Shaw Company

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: xxxviii, 420 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part II. Norms and trends in individual series for all Member Banks, by districts

Collection:: Economics Books

NORMS AND TRENDS IN EXPENSES 117 given in Chart 27, makes it easier to determine the norms and trends characterizing the different amounts. Norms 1. Amounts of interest and discounts on borrowed money, ex- pressed in terms of earning assets and related to the seven-year district levels, were larger than the average in every district in 1920 and 1921, in all but three of them in 1919, and in all but four of them in 1922. In every district in 1923, 1924, and 1925 they were lower than the averages. That is, the turn from high to low, relative to the district levels, came in 1923, except for four dis- tricts in which the change came one year earlier. In general, previ- ous to 1923, the amounts were high; subsequently they were low. 2. Relative to the yearly levels for the country as a whole, amounts in Boston and Cleveland were low, and those in Rich- mond, Atlanta, St. Louis, and Dallas high during each of the seven years. Similarly, those in New York, Chicago, and San Francisco were prevailingly low, while those in Minneapolis and Kansas City were generally high. Trends 1. The trend of the amounts between 1919 and 1921 for the country as a whole, and for each of the twelve districts, except Dallas and San Francisco between 1919 and 1920, and Philadel- phia between 1920 and 1921, was upward. It was downward for the country as a whole, and for all the districts between 1921 and 1923, and between 1924 and 1925. Over the whole period, 1919 to 1925, it was in all cases downward. 2. The downward trend between 1919 and 19235 is greater than that for the country as a whole in New York, Philadelphia, and Kansas City; it is appreciably less than that for the country in Cleveland and Richmond. 3. Districts with downward trends from 1921 to 1925 closely corresponding to each other are Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Kan- sas City; those with upward trends much alike between 1919 and 1921 are New York, Chicago, St. Louis, and Minneapolis. Different as are the rates of change upward and downward among the various districts, there is clearly more similarity than difference. In general, the “typical” behavior of the averages of

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation