Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1762969653

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-142432

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Place of publication:: Chicago

Publisher:: A. W. Shaw Company

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: xxxviii, 420 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part II. Norms and trends in individual series for all Member Banks, by districts

Collection:: Economics Books

[32 BANKING STANDARDS in 1920, one in 1921, and two in 1922.2 In 1919, 1923, 1924, and 1925, they were generally lower than their own seven-year levels. This is true of all districts in 1925, and of all except four districts in 1910, three in 1923,% and one in 1924. Generally speaking, therefore, years of relatively high and of relatively low net earn- ings, measured in terms of the respective district levels, were com- mon throughout the whole System, a condition similar to that observed for certain ratios analyzed in preceding chapters. But further analysis is needed in order to take account of the directions of change—plus or minus—{from year to year in the different district ratios. The nature and the percentage amounts of change are given in Table 83. Between 1919 and 1920 the TABLE 83 PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR OF YEARLY DISTRICT RATIOS OF NET EARNINGS TO EARNING Assets IN ALL MEM- sir BANKS BY YEARS AND FEDERAL RESERVE DisTRICTS Prom ans CHANGE FROM VAR TO Year FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS — —————————— Average {All Districts) Boston. ....... ye dB EEE New York. .....coovenvecnnnns Philadelphia. ... - coo cen Cleveland...... ..covavienennn Richmond. .....oovveneeecnenn Atlanta. ..oveereocecernoroanes ThiCAEO. cv vvreniereenaeaen louis. viii finneapolis.....covvveercnenes {ansas City... ..oovvvvennenns dallas... viii aT Francis . oo oe vseens ones 1919 to 1020 410.42 | + 9.45 +rq.36° +13.33 t12.00 +. r.73 Se. RN + i > aL 1920 | 1921 to to 1021 toa + 6.13 To +. 1 + —~ A.00 -8 - 1022 to 10922 —X2.1! —10.26 —r .82 - 80 eo 0 1923 to 1024 rr 3.23 —- 4.00 - 0.90 f.38 - $ fo) 1024 to 1925 - ~9 1 9.40 — 2.06 — 4.42 + 3.22 —- 5.90 + .6o ~- 44 5 «..50 F.3.50 = 0.00 £ 0.00 —_ 6.20 ratios in all but three districts increased. Moreover, with the ex- ception of Dallas, all of the districts showing a rise between 1919 and 1920 were low in 1919 relative to their own district level. Of the four districts with ratios in 1919 higher than these levels, the ratios in three decreased between 1919 and 1920. Between 1920 and 1921 net earnings decreased in five and increased in seven districts. By 1921, however, a general downward move- ment set in and continued until the close of 1925, all districts, except three between 1921 and 1022, one between 1922 and 1923, three between 1923 and 1924, and four between 1924 and 1925, “3 Tn one district, Atlanta, the ratio was the same as the seven-year average.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation