Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1762969653

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-142432

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Place of publication:: Chicago

Publisher:: A. W. Shaw Company

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: xxxviii, 420 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

APPENDIX 1 387 Case 1. (See footnote, page 336.) On referring to the results for Group 3 in this analysis (Table IV), it is seen that this excep- tion is probably due to the large constant tendency for net earn- ings ratios to decrease. (See discussion under Group 3, above.) The natural tendency for gross earnings ratios in banks in this group is to decrease, and it was shown that gross earnings ratios must increase o.17 of a point in banks in which it alone is assumed to determine net earnings ratios before the constant tendency for net earnings ratios to decrease is counteracted. Hence, in so far as the value —o.o1 results from such banks, its meaning is that gross earnings ratios increased less than 0.17 of a point on the average in those banks. Case 2. (See footnote to page 339.) This exception is prob- ably due to a strong constant tendency for net earnings ratios to increase for banks with increasing or with decreasing total expense ratios, as shown by the constant K;, = + 2.47 + 0.31. (See discussion of regression tendencies, Group 4.) Case 3. (See footnote to page 339.) This exceptionally large difference is probably due to the combined strong tendencies (a) for net earnings ratios of banks in Group 4 to increase, re- gardless of the direction of change in gross earnings ratios, and (6) for net earnings ratios of banks in Group 3 to decrease re- gardless of direction of change in total expense ratios. That is, it is measurable in terms of the combined constants K, (for Group 4) == + 1.02 and K, (for Group 3) =- 1.32. Case 4. (See footnote to page 340.) The fact that the net change in this case is positive (+ 0.24) is probably due to the large constant, K, = + 2.47. Even though total expense is as- sumed to be increasing, which has the effect of decreasing net earnings, the increases are not large enough to predominate over this large constant tendency for net earnings ratios to increase. (See further discussion of Group 4, above.) Case 5. (See footnote, page 340.) This positive 0.07 is evi- dently due to the strong tendency for the net earnings ratios of banks in Group 2 to increase, regardless of the direction of change in total expense ratios. The constant, K,, for this group = 4 2.16. Even though total expense ratios are here assumed to be increasing, which has the effect of decreasing net earnings,

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation