Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1762969653

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-142432

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Place of publication:: Chicago

Publisher:: A. W. Shaw Company

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: xxxviii, 420 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part II. Norms and trends in individual series for all Member Banks, by districts

Collection:: Economics Books

y 2 BANKING STANDARDS TABLE 37 PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR OF YEARLY DISTRICT Ratios oF DEMAND DEPOSITS TO ToTAL OF TIME AND DeMaND Deposits IN ALL MEMBER BANKS BY YEARS AND FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM YEAR To YEAR FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS sr emt Boston. . . New York. .. Philadelphia. Tleveland.... _ichmond. .. itlanta. .... “hicago...... t.Louis...... Jinneapolis. . . lansas City. . vallas......... San Francisco. Average (All Districts) 1919 | ¥920 | 1021 to - to to 1920 1921 1922 — 4.54 — 6.06 —2.48 6o 40 = af -1i 1022 to “naa —" af 1023 1024 -_—2.70 1024 to 1025 —1.,08 —1.08 -3.012 -—~2.20 -2.05 “+1.50 40.10 —0.88 “+2.31 +2.03 —0.20 —-£.30 the districts, the direction of the change in the ratios of demand deposits to total deposits. The district levels are different, as shown in Table 34, yet the years when the ratios are high or low are essentially the same. Is there consistency among the districts in the direction of the changes from year to year? The average change, for all districts combined, was downward each year, as shown in Table 37. All of the separate districts (except Dallas in 1920, as compared with 1919; Chicago in 1922, as compared with 1921; San Francisco in 1923, as compared with 1922; and Atlanta, Chicago, Minneapolis, and Kansas City in 1925 as compared with 1924) register similar year-to-year changes. This marked uniform- ity is in sharp contrast with the TABLE 38 changes from year to year.in the ratios of demand deposits to earning assets. In the latter case, except in 1921 as com- pared with 1920, the direction of change varies among the different districts. Striking asis the fact of down- ward year-to-year changes in all of the districts, as summarized

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation