Das Jungdeutsche Manifest

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1779856016

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-164114

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Mahraun, Artur http://d-nb.info/gnd/118781278

Title:: Das Jungdeutsche Manifest

Edition:: 2. Auflage

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Jungdeutscher Verl.

Year of publication:: [1928?]

Scope:: 208 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: IV. Abschnitt. Organisationsformen und Führungsformen

Collection:: Economics Books

b85 CHAP. vii] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES I do not propose to answer the points of your address serigtim, but shall briefly put before you the position as [ see it. The paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 of your address deal with the constitutional position of the Upper House. Co That is the great constitutional issue with which my late Premier invited me to deal. I declined, because I considered the matter too grave for 2 Governor to touch without a mandate from the people. By the exercise of the prerogative of dissolution the people are asked to say what they wish done. I fully recognize the inadvisableness of frequent general elections, I appreciate the peculiar inconveniences of an election at this time, but 1 regard it as of paramount importance that the country should speak its mind on this question, and therefore I have to decline the praver of your address, I recognize to the full the responsibility I have taken on my shoulders, throughout this disturbed political period. From time to time, under the constitution, a Governor has to take responsibility, but I cannot, shirk it when laid pon me. The reading of the reply in the House caused a somewhat violent explosion of wrath, the ex-Prime Minister remark- ing®: ‘This is a somewhat extraordinary position. His Excellency has turned down his thumb. The Czar has dis- missed the Duma. And now this matter is for the people of Queensland.” He proceeded later on to say that :— For centuries it has been recognized that the King of England, and in his self-governing dependencies the repre- sentative of the King, had no right to govern at all, had no right to use the people’s money, except to govern and use the public moneys in accordance with the wishes and Opinions of the representatives of the people. That is “onstitutional government, that is self-government, and to claim anything else for the King or a Governor is to set 10 the claim that cost Charles I his head. The dissolution proceeded, with the result that Mr. Philp’s Ministry was crushingly defeated in the country, having only twenty-five members out of a House of seventy- two, while Mr. Kidston had twenty-five supporters, and * Parliamentary Debates, c, 1783.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation