Responsible government in the Dominions: Responsible government in the Dominions

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1780159447

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537

Title:: Das Kapital

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: J. H. W. Dietz Nachf., G. m. b. H.

Year of publication:: 1926-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1780159595

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-188277

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537

Title:: Der Produktionsprozeß des Kapitals

Volume count:: 1.1928

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: J. H. W. Dietz Nachf., G. m. b. H.

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: XLVIII, 768 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Dritter Abschnitt. Die Produktion des absoluten Mehrwertes

Collection:: Economics Books

CHAP. TIT] JUDICIAL APPEALS 1367 special reason the certificate should be granted, and there- upon an appeal shall lie to Her Majesty in Council on the question without further leave. Except as provided in this section, this Constitution shall not impair any right which the Queen may be pleased to exercise by virtue of her royal prerogative to grant special leave of appeal from the High Court to Her Majesty in Council. The Parliament may make laws limiting the mat- ters in which such leave may be asked, but proposed laws containing any such limitation shall be reserved by the Governor-General for Her Majesty’s pleasure. During the debates in the House of Lords on the passing of the Bill it was pointed out by Lord Russell of Killowen ! that while there was no appeal from the High Court except by its own leave in the special class of cases mentioned, there still existed an appeal from the decision of the State Courts direct to the Judicial Committee, and that a conflict of authority was thereby invited, since it might be held that the decision of the High Court, in a matter in which it could prevent an appeal to the Privy Council, should be regarded as equally final with the decision of the Privy Council in cases brought from a State Court. Mr. Haldane 2 also, in the House of Commons, agreed that there was a possibility of a sonflict of authority, but Lord James of Hereford ® expressed strongly the view that the decision of the Privy Council would prevail, as it was the decision of Her Majesty herself as the fountain of justice, administering justice throughout her Empire at home and abroad. Lord Davey? supported Lord Russell’s view, but the other view was accepted by Lord Selborne.’ Lord Alverstone,® and by Sir Robert Finlay.” The Commonwealth Judiciary Act, 1903, by which the High Court was constituted, provided by s. 39 (2) that the several Courts of the states should have federal jurisdiction except as provided in s. 38, and subject to conditions that every decision of the Supreme Court of a state in the exercise - Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Bill, p. 109. * Ibid., p. 68. ¢ Ibid., p. 108. * Ihid., p. 101, Thid.. p. 113. s Ibid., p. 117. T Ibid., p. 70.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation