Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Idaho

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Idaho

Monograph

Identifikator:
1795100052
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-179691
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Idaho
Edition:
[Rev. ed.]
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
VII, 80 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Idaho
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in Idaho for the years of 1921. 1922, and 1923
  • Tables and charts
  • Reservations by commissioner costigan respecting the commission's report on the costs of production of sugar beets

Full text

VI 
VI. Labor costs, Idaho, by areas—Continued. 
27. Hours of labor per acre to perform once the various ma- 
chine operations_ _____.__. _ ._.__. __ oa --__ 
28. Percentage of hand labor done by (1) contract labor, 
(2) family help, (3) hired help and grower’s labor. - 
VII. Horse labor costs, Idaho, by areas: 
29. Horse cost rates per hour_. - 
30. Horse time per acre. ______ mee 
31. Horse time per acre to perform once the various machine 
operations. __. o_o oo... 
VIII. Capital and capital charges, Idaho, by areas: 
32. Market value of sugar-beet land. _ 
33. Average value of other capital ._____ 
34. Value of land and other capital used ____ _________ 
35. Comparison of land charges as determined by three different 
methods. _ i —eeeam 
Comparison of total capital charges as determined by three 
methods— 
36. Peracre________. 
37. Perton.__________ cen 
38. Comparison of cash rental paid for land with estimated 
cash rentals. _________.__ _ ee 
39. Interest rates paid on farm mortgages_____. - 
40. Returns for capital, management, and labor. ____._______ 
IX. Farm practice in sugar-beet production: 
Kinds of operations and percentage of total number of farms 
on which each was performed a given number of times— 
41. On tractor and nontractor farms_____ 
42. On nontractor farms only _ oo 
Kinds and amounts of tractor work performed in sugar-beet 
production __ em 
44. Manuring practice in sugar-beet production. _. 
45, Hauling sugar beets. oo -- 
46. Pounds of beet seed planted per acre__.__.___.__. 
X. Types of farming on farms investigated, Idaho, by areas: 
47. Use made of farm area operated. oo __ 
48. Size of farms and relative importance of sugar-beet acreage - 
49. Sugar-beet yields per acre, by areas_.-_. .-.-._  - .---- 
50. Acreage of the principal crops grown_ _.__-________. 
51. Percentages of cultivated land devoted to various crops... 
52, Yields per acre of the principal crops grown.________..... 
52, Number per farm of head of various kinds of livestock .___ 
5%. Tenureoffarms._____________-._ - 
55. Tenure of sugar-beet land. _________. mm 
56. Abandoned beet acreage. oo. I 
XI. Miscellaneous tables giving the replies of the farmers to some 
general questions concerning the sugar-beet industry: 
Farmers’ replies to questions concerning— 
Effect of existence of the local sugar factory upon the 
value of— 
57. Farm land in general _____ -— 
58. Sugar-beet land___ ___ ooo 
59. Land used for crops that compete with sugar 
beets. oc eee 
60. Comparison of the estimated value of land used for the 
production of sugar beets with the estimated value of 
. land used for crops that compete with sugar beets____ 
81. Effect upon land values if beet-sugar factories were removed 
from the locality. em 
Farmers’ replies to questions concerning the extension and 
limitation of the sugar-beet acreage on the farms investigated 
in Idaho— 
62. Potential sugar-beet land_ _ ______-___  ---- 
53. Factors limiting the extension of sugar-beet acreage. - 
84 Affect of crop of sugar beets on other subsequent crops. 
85. Crops that compete most with sugar beets. _-__-- 
AR Farmers’ estimates of the profitableness of sugar beets 
as compared with other erons._ 
CONTENTS 
Page 
44 
44 
45 
45 
45 
46 
46 
47 
47 
48 
48 
49 
49 
50 
51 
53 
54 
54 
55 
56 
57 
57 
57 
58 
58 
£3 
bd 
59 
59 
50 
60 
60 
60 
61 
61 
62 
62 
62 
63 
aq
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Idaho. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.