Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1795102764
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-179770
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
United States
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
VII, 112 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in the Unitede States for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Econonomic significance of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Historical development of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Description of the growing of sugar beets and of the manufacture of beet sugar
  • Economic considerations concerning the maintenance and growth of the industry
  • The tariff in its relation to the sugar-beet industry
  • Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in the Unitede States for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923
  • Reservations by commissioner costigan respecting the commission's report on the costs of production of sugar beets

Full text

COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS 
TaBLE 54.—Comparison of capital charges for sugar-beet land and other capital, 
obtained by three different methods 
SUMMARY FOR THE UNITED STATES AND COMPARISON BY STATES. 
1921, 1922, AND 1923 
[Per ton of sugar beets harvested] 
rea and vear 
United States: 
3-year average. . 
1921. ___. 
1922_____._. 
923. ___ 
Michigan: 
3-year average... 
192)... 
1922 ___ 
1923... 
Ohio: 
i-year average... 
1921 -- 
‘922... 
1923. _. 
Nebraska: 
3-year average... 
1921... _ 
1922___. 
1923... 
Colorado: 
}-vear average. 
1921... 
1922... 
1923 __. 
nterest on all cap- 
tal, including the 
market value of 
land } 
At aver- 
age rates 
paid on 
farm 
norgages 
on the 
farms 
inves- 
vigated 
At 6 per 
ont rate 
Per ton 
‘1.31 
R2 
2 
17 
Per ton 
"1. 56 
1.81 
1.57 
1.27 
~C 
~7 
£ 
24 
. 06 
12 
vl 
a0 
44 
ro 
Stated 
cash 
ental of 
and and 
nterest 
1t 6 per 
ent on 
rapital 
sther 
than 
and 
Per ton 
$1.32 
1.52 
1. 36 
1.11 
Yi 
25 
12 
11 
19 
Area and vear 
Utah: 
3-year average.. 
192 convons 
1922... 
1923... -. 
[daho: 
3-year average.. 
1921 ___.... 
1922... comms 
1923 _.____. 
AN yoming: 
? vear average.. 
1921. __.... 
1922. cnn sms 
1923. ic 
Jontana: 
Tove ge. 
N 
Co 
Interest on all cap- 
ital, including the 
market value of 
land ! 
At aver- 
age rates 
paid on 
farm 
mortag es 
on the | 
farms 
inves- 
tigated 
At 6 per 
rent rate 
Per ton 
$1.09 
1.34 
".14 
80 
Per ton 
$1.37 
1.67 
1.43 
1.00 
LO! 
35 
95 
Q 
1.31 
1.76 
1.24 
1.02 
2 
98 
79 
4 
1.06 
1.27 
1.02 
95 
= ay 
08 
28 
«4 
91 
TE 
68 
97 
. 26 
73 
Stated 
cash 
rental of 
and and 
interest 
at 6 per 
cent on 
capital 
other 
than 
land 
Per ton 
$1.33 
1.63 
1.39 
. 97 
1.17 
1.57 
1.09 
L901 
.87 
1.04 
.84 
.78 
. 94 
1.12 
1.00 
79 
2.28 
2.42 
2.55 
1.82 
1 See footnotes to Tables 49 and 
SUMMARY 
TABLE 55.- 
—Comparison of rental charges for sugar-beet land 
FOR THE UNITED STATES AND ANALYSIS, BY STATES, 1922 
[Per acre of sugar beets harvested] 
% 30 
United States .__.___ 
Michigan... ______.___.___. 
10) 51 Uo J 
Nebraska... ooo. .___.__ 
Colorado... ooo eee. 
Utah .- 
idaho. ea. 
Wyoming... ... coe. 
Montana... .o.__._. 
California___._. 
Per cent of 
sugar-beet 
area inves- 
tigated for 
vhich cash 
rental was 
actually 
paid 
Per cent 
5 4 
12.7 
4 () 
7 
“9 
Net cash 
ental actu- 
ally paid 
for beet 
ind rented 
for cash 
Per acre | 
$11.31 
9.04 
8. 60 
? 91 
RO 
el 
7 
5 
0. 35 
tated cash 
rental for 
yeot land 
share 
rented 
Per acre 
$13. 35 
8.29 
9. 68 
12. 14 
14. 41 
A. 55 
2,73 
16 
9.09 
17. 09 
Stated cash| 
rental for 
beet land 
yperated by 
‘he owners 
and land 
share 
rented 
jtated cash 
rental for 
beet land 
perated by 
the owners 
Per acre Per acre 
$13. 76 213. 67 
9.36 
9. 67 
13.09 
15. 12 
5.91 
21 
76 
10. 61 
21. 07 
9.14 
9.67 
12. 43 
-4, 67 
15, 87 
2? 90 
51 
.93 
3.77 
Average 
paid and 
inpaid cast 
rental for 
all beet 
land in- 
cluded in 
this inves- 
tigation 
Per acre 
$13. 54 
9. 12 
9. 52 
2.49 
4. 60 
5. 87 
00 
51 
39 
78
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Nationale Bodenreform. Druck und Verlag von U. Weichert, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.