Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1795102764
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-179770
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
United States
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
VII, 112 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in the Unitede States for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Econonomic significance of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Historical development of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Description of the growing of sugar beets and of the manufacture of beet sugar
  • Economic considerations concerning the maintenance and growth of the industry
  • The tariff in its relation to the sugar-beet industry
  • Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in the Unitede States for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923
  • Reservations by commissioner costigan respecting the commission's report on the costs of production of sugar beets

Full text

COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS 
85 
TABLE 57.— Returns for capital, management, and labor other than contract and 
tractor overations— Continued 
SUMMARY FOR THE UNITED STATES AND ANALYSIS BY STATES, 1921, 
1922. AND 1923——continued 
Area’and year 
Nebraska: 
3-year average... —___.__. 
1928 eee 
1922 oo... 
1923__ 
Colorado: 
3-year average _.._____ ___ 
921... mmr ome 
1922____. em ————- 
1923 __ 
Utah: 
3-year average... . .__. 
1921... J 
1922 ee 
1923 ee 
[daho: 
3-vear average o.oo. 
I ie cmm———- 
32 
1923...- _— 
Wyoming: 
3-year average_.__._. 
1921... 
1922. ___. 
1923__. 
Montana: 
3-year average 
192) ce 
1922 
1923 
California: 
3-vear avera 
21 __. 
Ie ° 
092% 
Value of 
and and 
other 
*gnital 
Pl 
Per acre 
5206 
224 
200 
190 
221 
231 
226 
205 
244 
274 
249 
| OR 
232 
264 
232 
201 
58 
7F 
Hours of 
abor other 
‘han con- 
Tact and 
tractor 
wperation 
« 
a); 
Hours per 
acre 
55.6 
54.8 
59.1 
53.2 
30. 7 
61.2 
58. & 
99 1 
30. 4 
59.2 
60. 2 
62.3 
73. 4 
61.1 
64. 3 
35.92 
Amount by 
which the 
returns 
Tom sugar 
oeets ex- 
ceed the 
osts of pro-| 
{uction, ex- 
clusive of 
capital | 
‘harges, the 
costs of all | 
direct Jabor 
on machine 
Jperations, 
and all in- | 
lirect labor! 
n0sts 
(4) 
Per acre 
347.61 
2% 22 
72 
5.74 
2.51 
ne 
1c 
-. 97 
6 AE 
50. 76 
51. 38 
46. 28 
11.84 
A" A] 
io! 
Gross re- 
turns for 
abor, capi: 
tal, and 
nanage- 
ment 
(8) 
Cents per 
hour of la- 
hor on ma- 
chine oper- 
ations and 
indirect 
labor 
85.6 
51.5 
19.7 
Q3 + 
63. 4 
49. 1 
en (J 
60.3 
la 6 
84.4 
QR & 
73.0 
19.4 
100. 2 
105 R 
2.1 
JT0SS re- 
turns for 
abor and 
manage- 
ment 
(6) 
Cents per 
hour of la- 
hor on ma- 
shine oper- 
ations and 
indirect 
labor 
59.6 
22.6 
95.8 
68.3 
37.1 
21.7 
32.0 
AQ 8 
30.9 
~19.3 
54.2 
75.5 
47.5 
'0.8 
5.0 
4 4 
A 
Gross re- 
turns for 
capital and 
manage- 
ment as exs 
pressed in 
Jercentages 
of total 
capital 
:mployed 
in sugar- 
beet pro- 
duction 
™N 
Per cent 
14.28 
4.80 
26.20 
16.22 
8.48 
4.25 
7.69 
15.08 
6.30 
—4.03 
12.41 
19.99 
10. 46 
~3.34 
18.59 
22.53 
6.97 
~2.70 
6.53 
15. 53 
18. 08 
~. 40 
29.99 
26 
01 
95 
43 
wv. 43 
Nore.—The figures in column 2 were taken from Table 51, those in column 3 from Table 43, and those 
in column 4 are derived from Table 17. All minus signs (—) indicate that the costs, as caleu}ated for use 
in this table, were greater than the returns hv the amannts chown
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

United States. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.