Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

National origins provision of immigration law

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Identifikator:
1796380105
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-196168
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
National origins provision of immigration law
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1929
Scope:
III, 171 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Statement of John B. Trevor, National Immigration Restriction Conference, New York City
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • National origins provision of immigration law
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Wilbur J. Carr, assistant secretary, Department of State
  • Statement of Samuel W. Boggs, geographer, Department of State
  • Statement of Dr. Joseph A. Hill, assistant to the director of the census, Department of Commerce
  • Statement of hon. Robe Carl White, assistant secretary, Department of Labor
  • Statement of hon. Harry E. Hull, commissioner general of immigration, Department of Labor
  • Statement of Demarest Lloyd, representing delegation of patriotic societies, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Bell Gurnee, representing National Civic Federation, Women's Department
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary-general, representing the Sons of American Revolution
  • Statement of John B. Trevor, National Immigration Restriction Conference, New York City
  • Statement of Dr. Herbert Friedenwald, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of hon. B. carroll Reece, representative in congress from the State of Tennessee
  • Statement of col. John Thomas Taylor, representing the American Legion, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Edward R. lewis, chairman executive committee, Immigration Restriction Legislation, Chicago, Ill.
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary General Sons of American Revolution, 1227 Sixteenth Street, Washington, D.C. - resumed
  • Statement of Samuel A. Mathewson, University Club, New York City
  • Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States
  • Statement of Hon. John W. McCormack, representive in congress from the state of Massachusetts
  • Statement of J. Edward Cassidy, executive director United States Air Force Association, Washington , D.C.
  • Statement of Maj. Gist Blair, representing the military order of the World War, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Frances H. Kinnicutt, immigration restriction league, and allied patriotic society, New York City

Full text

NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 53 
And now let me turn to the apportionment on the bagis the 
census of 1790, which has been the focus of attack, ds you a. ogall. 
The census publication Century of Population Growth has beert’ pm, 
der fire by the Irish societies, in fact it was under fire from the 
moment it came out, because they claimed the Revolution: was, peally 
fought by Irishmen, and that all our institutions: were developed hy 
the Irish. I am not saying anything against the'Irish; I like them 
personally and employ almost exclusively Irish; that J  peithorabops 
nor there—but they are not entitled to any more copsidetatiott gan 
the Germans or Scandinavians. or 
I omitted to state that the Century of Population Growth as a 
study is really out of the discussion. All the analyses of the colonial 
population have been restudied and re-presented in an entirely new 
proposition. So that any attack on the Century of Population 
Growth is really out of this question. But I believe Senator Ship- 
stead quoted in his argument a letter of Mr. Rossiter about the lost 
schedules, which have been a matter of controversy. I do not want 
to quote the Senator inaccurately, but I read the record only a few 
days since, and if my recollection is correct, it was his impression 
from an article published in the Outlook of, I think, 1906, before 
the Century of Population Growth was prepared, that 25 per cent 
of those schedules were missing. As a matter of actual fact, when 
Mr. Rossiter who was the author of Century of Population Growth, 
developed his tables on the colonial population, I can only figure 
out over an approximation of 11 per cent, at the very outside, for the 
missing schedules, or the alleged missing schedules; and the areas 
considered to which these missing schedules referred are so dis- 
tributed that it is possible to get substantially accurate information 
regarding the population that was in .those areas. 
The CrrairMax. When you speak of the Century of Population 
Growth is that the work that is referred to in the reports made to this 
committee? 
My. Trevor. That is the book that is always attacked, Mr. Chair- 
man, and it really is entirely out of the picture. : 
Senator Reep. It is a publication of the Census Bureau made in 
£910. 
The Crammmax. I only query on it, because, if you will recall, in 
the report Doctor Hill made and that the experts made there 1s a 
particular volume referred to, and referred to quite often, as one of 
the authoritative references. Is that the work you refer to? 
Mr. Trevor. If you will pardon me, Doctor Hill in his prelim- 
inary report utilized the apportionment of the colonial population 
as it was set forth in the Century of Population Growth, but that 
was only in the preliminary figures, which he stated at that time 
were subject to correction. 
The CramrMaN. That is the February, 1928, report you refer to? 
Mr. Trevor. No, sir; that was the January, 1927, report. 
The CuairMAN. In the February, 1928, report he refers to a 
volume, and I was simply asking for information, whether that is 
the same book to which you are referring now. ; 
Mr. Trevor. My recollection of that testimony possibly is a little 
different from yours. 
The Cuamman. Possibly so.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

National Origins Provision of Immigration Law. Gov. Pr. Off., 1929.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.