Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Foreign trade zones (or free ports)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Foreign trade zones (or free ports)

Monograph

Identifikator:
1801857903
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-199077
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Foreign trade zones (or free ports)
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
United States Government Printing Off.
Year of publication:
1929
Scope:
IX, 322 S
Ill., graph. Darst
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part 1. General analysis
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Foreign trade zones (or free ports)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part 1. General analysis
  • Part 2. The free ports of Europe
  • Index

Full text

10 
FOREIGN TRADE ZONES 
Bismarck had long importuned Hamburg to join: the Customs 
Union, and in 1882 it consented. Yet so strongly did the belief in 
the old transshipment trade persist that the greater part of the harbor 
was fenced off and set apart, to remain a free port, outside the Cus- 
toms Union. The Empire agreed to contribute 40,000,000 marks 
toward the construction of this free port, the remaining cost, about 
150,000,000 marks, to be borne by Hamburg. The free port was 
opened in 1888. Thus Hamburg was enabled to continue and expand 
her transshipment trade and to offer such economies and facilities 
to shipping as to stimulate her merchant marine. 
The British and Dutch ports, which are so important in transship- 
ment trade, have not found free ports necessary because of the very 
limited tariff schedules of those countries. England entered the nine- 
teenth century with a cumbrous mass of tariff regulations mherited 
from the past, and it was not until 1853 and 1860 that Gladstone’s 
laws swept away import duties by the hundred. Import duties are 
now restricted to a very few commodities. The Netherlands, too, 
clung to the protective tariff until about 1850, when a movement for 
free trade grew up which resulted in a lowering of tariff rates until 
they were little more than nominal in amount. 
London without specially segregated free zones has been able to 
maintain its premier position as the great transshipment and con- 
signment market of the world, and it annually reexports goods origi- 
nating in other countries to the value of about $400,000,000. So 
important is the trade in foreign goods that it is able to devote entire 
warehouses to special commodities. Grain, sugar, tobacco, wool, 
meat and softwood form the bulk of the tonnage, but innumerable 
‘other articles are handled. They come from the four corners of the 
earth, and include mahogany from British Honduras, Nicaragua, 
Cuba, Costa Rica, and Africa; cedar from British Honduras and 
Mexico; walnut, rosewood, ebony, and teak from India, Asia, and 
America; costly carpets from India, Persia, Turkey, and China; silks 
from India, China, and Japan; porcelain from China and Japan; 
idols, ivory figures, bronzes, and lacquer cabinets from the Orient; 
furs from Canada and Russia; marble from Italy and Asia Minor; 
rubber from India, Colombo, Java, and Singapore; shells from the 
southern seas; ivory from Africa and India; feathers from Africa; 
spices from Ceylon; perfumes from Arabia; tin from the Straits Set- 
tlements and Bolivia; burlap from India; tropical fruits from India 
and the East Indies; and many other commodities. 
Dr. D. J. Owen, manager of the port of London, in a recent report 
showing the development of the great business of this port, makes 
the following statement: 
The trade of the port is, in reality, a reflection of the trade of the British Nation. 
A Tittle consideration will enable one to realize that London has not developed
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Wirtschaftlichkeitslehre. Österr. Staatsdr., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.