Secretarial practice

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1828236004

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-249926

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Secretarial practice

Edition:: fourth edition

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: W. Heffer & Sons Ltd

Year of publication:: 1930

Scope:: viii, 987 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

AGRICULTURAL RELIEF Myr. Kercuam. I used “Burley tobacco’ because that is the thing you are discussing. . Mr. Kesoe. That is the thought I have. Mr. Kercuam. One other question supplementary: Then, as I understand it, granting that the equalization fee works as we expect it will, if incorporated in the law, the other 40 per cent who for varying reasons have not desired to come in, would be brought into the organi- zation and all would bear the expense? Mr. Kenoe. They would not necessarily be brought into the organization under the equalization fee. Mr. Kercuam. I do not mean the cooperatives, but I mean into the one phase that has to do with bearing the losses. Mr. KEHOE. With the stabilization and bearing the losses—yes, sir: that is the way I understand it. Mr. AswerL. This question is constantly in my mind: I am a member of a cotton cooperative, and have been for many years. I pay $10 a year dues—I think it is $10. If you put on the equaliza- tion fee, and those who are on the outside get the same advantages I have on the mnside. what inducement would I have to continue to © that $10: 1. Keroe. None. r. AsweLL. Would not a lot of us drop out? wn Keno. I take it if 10 per cent remained you could operate. br. AsweLL. We only have 6.8 per cent now. Mr. Kenor. Well, 5 or even 2 per cent of you could operate. 1 take it that there would be enough generosity left among the cotton growers to contribute, if necessary, an extra $10; but there are not enough to contribute 50 per cent of their time and run for four or five years without relief. T Mr. Apkins. I think we had better pursue this a little further. he point Mr. Clarke raised is rather important. I think, Mr. Kehoe, ey ery member of this committee appreciates the situation here and wants to relieve the agricultural situation. But on this particular point: You take your cooperatives on tobacco, grain or milk. Iam cor, and Mr. Clarke is interested in milk. It does not make any difference whether we get this bill or whether we do not get it. There are : certain number of us in various localities that believe that the loca cooperatives can eliminate certain local expenses, and it is to ily bh antage to do that, and that we locally get the benefit of that. arket a Ww en, we consider the broader vision of stabilizing the benefit by Se Os, so that by eason of that stabilization we will all holy of oll yet something else must be done that wil require the Lone 2 engaged in that particular activity. coopera fives: Js Suilization fee idea. We will continue as local milk field, d vou ry © will continue as a local cooperative in the because we see the direct local Mook: Ne of us wlll contiirie that have been made, not onl Now, the various attempts market with this surpl ot only by you but by others to stabilize this of selling under or 7 Sos benefit all who have the privilege tives, endeavor in holding that > ho are engaged in coopera” stabilized at a little higher lec] wn e main props of that being that surplus away Fronane! Ig el, and that they are not going to take and in the end the exp ong as they can buy from the outsiders; Ee xpense incident thereto, the local cooperative 188 I

Access restriction

Copyright

Full text: Agricultural relief (Pt. 3)

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation