Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Unemployment in the United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Unemployment in the United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1828236179
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-226169
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Unemployment in the United States
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
United States, Government Printing Office
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
II, 193 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Statement of Miss Grace E. Cooke, representing the National Employment Board, Boston, Mass
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Unemployment in the United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, a senator from the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. Henry A. Atikinson, general secretary Church Union and World Alliance, New York City
  • Statement of Mr. William Green, president of American Federation of Labor
  • Statement of Dr. Samuel Joseph, College of the City of New York
  • Statement by Miss Frances Perkins, industrial commissioner of the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. William T. Foster
  • Statement of Prof. Paul Douglas, of Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa.
  • Statement of John B. Andrews, Director of the American Association for Labor Legislation
  • Statement of James A. Emery, Washtington, D.C., representing the National Association of Manufacturers, and others
  • Statement of Mrs. E. E. Danley, representing the National Board of the Young Women´s Christian Association
  • Statement of James A. Emery, representing National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America
  • Statement of Thomas F. Cadwalader, representing the Sentinels of the Republic, Baltimore, MD.
  • Statement of Miss Grace E. Cooke, representing the National Employment Board, Boston, Mass
  • Statement of Fred J. Winslow, Chicago, Ill., representing the Illinois Employment Board
  • Statement of Frank L. Peckham
  • Statement of James M. Mead, of New York
  • Closing statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, United States Senator from the States of Yew York
  • Statement of hon. John L. Cable, a representative in congress from the State of Ohio

Full text

144 UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 
off private initiative in the employment field is to remove one of the 
most effective mediums for helping the unemployed to find suitable 
employment. 
Mr. Green stated yesterday that no one should be forced to pay for 
ajob. Iagree with Mr. Green. But no oneis forced to pay an agency 
for services in locating and negotiating employment. There is hardly 
an industry of any size that does not maintain its own employment 
department where men and women may apply direct. Schools, 
colleges, Young Women Christian Association, Young Men’s Christian 
Association, employer's associations, in great numbers, labor and 
fraternal organizations; maintain free employment bureaus and, in 
addition thereto, there are the State and municipal offices. The help 
wanted columns of the news and trade papers are effective mediums 
for locating employment. With all these avenues open, through which 
employment may be secured without cost, is there any reason why the 
unemployed should not be privileged to pay for emplovment services 
if they so elect? 
Mr. Green criticized fee-charging agencies, because, as he stated, it 
served the employer to the disadvantage of the employee. He stated 
that private agencies, in filling the requirements of the employer, 
discriminated against the man and woman 45 years and over; that 
they directed the unemployed to employers who, in times of business 
depression, paid low wages and required long working hours. I 
wonder, Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee, what the 
public employment offices would do in such instances? Would they 
refuse to serve the employer; would they pigeonhole the order and 
thereby perhaps hold up production, or would they use their best 
judgment and serve the employer and the employee for the best inter- 
ests of all concerned? 
The organization I represent takes no position in respect to the crea- 
ting of a federal service on a permanent statutory basis, or for a trial 
period, or the expansion of State offices. We are not afraid of competi- 
tion. But it does oppose being made a part of the clearing house plan 
or in any way coming under the jurisdiction of the Department of 
Labor, or the Director General of the United States Employment 
Service, and coutend that S. 3060 indirectly includes fee-charging 
agencies. 
If I heard a statement correctly put by one of the Congressmen on 
my left yesterday, it was to this effect, that the Labor Commissioner, 
or the head of the labor department for the State.of West Virginia, 
had approved S. 3060. If that was the Congressman’s statement, I 
would call to the attention of this committee the fact that the State 
of West Virginia must first change a law before it could accept S. 
3060; for that State and several other Southern States have laws 
which go so far as to prohibit by a heavy tax the taking of labor from 
one county to another, to say nothing of from one State to another. 
Lest my judgment savor of prejudice and thereby be of no value, 
I make no attempt to pass judgment on the practicability of a Federal 
clearing system; but I would, however, recommend for your consider- 
ation two very enlightening articles on the subject by Mr. Kenneth 
Colback, superintendent of the Philadelphia Employment Office 
which is maintained by the State of Pennsylvania. One article is 
entitled ‘Unemployment Statistics” and appears in the Saturday 
Evening Post of February 16, 1929. The other is an article entitled
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Unemployment in the United States. United States, Government Printing Office, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.