Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Unemployment in the United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Unemployment in the United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1828236179
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-226169
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Unemployment in the United States
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
United States, Government Printing Office
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
II, 193 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Closing statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, United States Senator from the States of Yew York
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Unemployment in the United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, a senator from the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. Henry A. Atikinson, general secretary Church Union and World Alliance, New York City
  • Statement of Mr. William Green, president of American Federation of Labor
  • Statement of Dr. Samuel Joseph, College of the City of New York
  • Statement by Miss Frances Perkins, industrial commissioner of the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. William T. Foster
  • Statement of Prof. Paul Douglas, of Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa.
  • Statement of John B. Andrews, Director of the American Association for Labor Legislation
  • Statement of James A. Emery, Washtington, D.C., representing the National Association of Manufacturers, and others
  • Statement of Mrs. E. E. Danley, representing the National Board of the Young Women´s Christian Association
  • Statement of James A. Emery, representing National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America
  • Statement of Thomas F. Cadwalader, representing the Sentinels of the Republic, Baltimore, MD.
  • Statement of Miss Grace E. Cooke, representing the National Employment Board, Boston, Mass
  • Statement of Fred J. Winslow, Chicago, Ill., representing the Illinois Employment Board
  • Statement of Frank L. Peckham
  • Statement of James M. Mead, of New York
  • Closing statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, United States Senator from the States of Yew York
  • Statement of hon. John L. Cable, a representative in congress from the State of Ohio

Full text

UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 173 
she | 
gals 
hat 
the 
om- | 
she 
yuh 
ht, 
the 
fate 
rive 
ynal 
tha 
of 
wre? 
O11. 
nal, 
:on- 
ake 
nal, 
5 IS 
| of 
I~ 
0y- 
ney 
not 
ese 
1 of 
aen 
WOW 
1s, 
i11e 
-he 
aly 
we 
on. 
ere 
elm 
lin 
On, 
women working in factories at night if they want to? That is depriv- 
ing them of liberty, of their right to contract.” But, of course, the 
court came up to date; it had not the old-fashioned notion of consti- 
sutional government. 
Mr. Montague. You were dealing under a constitution then of 
anlimited powers; you were dealing with the New York constitution. 
The Federal Constitution is a Constitution of limited powers; you 
were dealing with a constitution of unlimited powers. There 1s a 
vast difference. I do not say this is unconstitutional, but I say there 
«s a vast difference in the two cases. 
Senator WAGNER. The question of being deprived of the freedom 
of right to contract—that right is guaranteed by the State consti- 
jution and the Federal Constitution—due process of law, of course. 
That is protected under both Constitutions. 
Mr. Tucker. Yes. 
Mr. MonTaGUE. That is clearly under the police regulation of 
your State. 
Senator Wagner. That is the argument made here, that we are 
ziving the money to the State in return for a surrender of its police 
powers. Why, the States do not give up anything; they exercise 
their police power by saying “All right; we will take this money 
and we will collect these statistics for you; we will cooperate with 
the other States.” It is no more than if I make a contract with you 
0 buy your house for a certain sum of money. I do not give up my 
right to contract when I make that contract with you; I exercise 
my right to contract. So the State is not giving up anything; it 
sxercises the right which it has, It may reject or accept, as it pleases. 
And all of this talk about coercion of the State is untenable, to put 
it very mildly. Mr. La Guardia asked Mr. Emory, “Well, if you 
are opposed to this, do you favor a Federal employment exchange 
in the States,” and he sald, “Yes; provided they cooperate with the 
States.” And a little while later, in opposition to this bill, he said 
‘The objection I have here is that if the State does not accept the 
Federal aid, then the Government may itself erect an employment 
sxchange.” Now what sort of logic is that? 
Mr. SumNERs. Senator, are you through with that particular 
statement? 
Senator WacenNer. I did not finish my historical recitation of the 
axperience we had in the State of New York. That case went to the 
Court of Appeals and they sustained the constitutionality of the 
egislation. They said the State has an interest in its individuals 
and has an interest in their helath and their welfare, and this is a 
protective measure in the exercise of its power to protect the health 
of the people of the State. And that is what this is. Men are 
starving, hungry, in a country of plenty and some one will talk 
about some constitutional inhibition of a power which, we have 
seen exercising from the formation of our Government. And this 
argument is as old as the Government itself. 
Mr. Bacuman. I want to say I do not want to be misunderstood. 
[ have great respect for the opinion of the Senator and the opinion 
of the court in the State of New York, and as I understand this bill, 
[ am not disturbed about the constitutional features of it; because 
[ can see very clearly you try to get around whatever constitutional 
questions mav be presented against it by the wording of the bill.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Unemployment in the United States. United States, Government Printing Office, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.