Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Unemployment in the United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Unemployment in the United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
1828236179
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-226169
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Unemployment in the United States
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
United States, Government Printing Office
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
II, 193 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Statement of Prof. Paul Douglas, of Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa.
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Unemployment in the United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, a senator from the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. Henry A. Atikinson, general secretary Church Union and World Alliance, New York City
  • Statement of Mr. William Green, president of American Federation of Labor
  • Statement of Dr. Samuel Joseph, College of the City of New York
  • Statement by Miss Frances Perkins, industrial commissioner of the State of New York
  • Statement of Dr. William T. Foster
  • Statement of Prof. Paul Douglas, of Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, Pa.
  • Statement of John B. Andrews, Director of the American Association for Labor Legislation
  • Statement of James A. Emery, Washtington, D.C., representing the National Association of Manufacturers, and others
  • Statement of Mrs. E. E. Danley, representing the National Board of the Young Women´s Christian Association
  • Statement of James A. Emery, representing National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America
  • Statement of Thomas F. Cadwalader, representing the Sentinels of the Republic, Baltimore, MD.
  • Statement of Miss Grace E. Cooke, representing the National Employment Board, Boston, Mass
  • Statement of Fred J. Winslow, Chicago, Ill., representing the Illinois Employment Board
  • Statement of Frank L. Peckham
  • Statement of James M. Mead, of New York
  • Closing statement of hon. Robert F. Wagner, United States Senator from the States of Yew York
  • Statement of hon. John L. Cable, a representative in congress from the State of Ohio

Full text

That 
now 
ugh 
loy- 
h to 
ome 
8CO-~ 
3 at 
tes, 
ions 
ally 
Was 
OI- 
well 
ORE 
tee, 
160) 
: the 
sent 
ve a 
ndi- 
I 
dang 
rom 
lave 
any 
day 
reek 
lays 
a8 a 
und, 
1ar- 
cher 
em- 
own 
‘hen 
firm 
eas, 
and 
1 or 
em- 
and 
{ be 
far 
r of 
UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 75 
men was able to handle the business of a larger number of men on 
the docks. 
This may decrease the number of men employed, you may say; 
instead of having 1,000 men partially employed all the time as at 
present, you would have 400 fully employed and 300 partially em- 
ployed, and a further 300 squeezed out into other industries, who 
would be unemployed; but the last 300 men would then be engaged 
in producing other products. 
Mr. Sumners. There would be a consuming power, you say, 
waiting for them? Where will the 300 be that were squeezed out 
altogether when other industries likewise are dropping them? 
Mr. Doucras. Let us suppose in this harbor you had formerly 600 
men, 500 being your minimum number employed and 700 the 
maximum, which would make an average of 600. And suppose they 
were working 5 days a week at $6 a day, then their weekly pay roll 1s 
$18,000. Now, let us suppose there are 1,000 men in the harbor, 
then their weekly average would be $18 a week, now, you have not 
increased the total amount of work in the harbor. But something 
has happened; and what is it that has happened? You have $18,000 
now shared among 700 workers, so that they would now earn on an 
average $26 a week, by dividing the $18,000 among 700 men, you 
would get $26 a week. Therefore, each person employed would 
receive $8 more each week than he had before; and there would be 
700 people employed who would have this $8 a week more than they 
had before, or fifty-six hundred dollars more purchasing power, 
coming from their fuller employment, and that would create oppor- 
tunities, that increase demand for products for those who were 
squeezed out. 
Mr. Sumners. Where are those 300 people now who got squeezed 
out and who are getting no money at all? 
Mr. Dovcras. In the first place we should have employment 
agencies to direct them to the opportunities for employment which 
will come in the various industries from the expenditure of the 
increased purchasing power of the other 700. } 
Mr. SumnERs. Yes; but how are the 300 fellows who had jobs 
and were squeezed out in times of depression like these to get jobs? 
Mr. DovcLas. Do you deny that $5,600 more will be in the 
pockets of those remaining employed? 
Mr. SumnErs. No, indeed; but what about the 300 who were 
squeezed out of their jobs and who have no money-in their pockets? 
Mr. Dovucras. Well, I want to call your attention to this question: 
What will they do with the money, this $5,600 extra purchasing power 
which the 700 who are employed now have in addition to what they 
formerly had? You must see they will either spend it or save it. 
Mr. SumyErs. Suppose they do; but what about the 300 of that 
number aho are now unemployed——getting no money? 
Mr. Doucras. I say that it would be better to have the 700 men 
more fully employed than 1,000 men on partial employment, even 
more full employed than 1,000 men on partial employment. Even 
if 300 were thrown out of employment entirely, that fact at least 
would identify the shortcomings—this fact that there are 300 men 
out of employment. . . . 
Mr. Sumners. I do not know that I quite appreciate your point. 
You say it is not better for 1,000 men to get a smaller wage than 700 
to have the full wage and 300 idle?
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Unemployment in the United States. United States, Government Printing Office, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What color is the blue sky?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.