Modern business geography

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1830562916

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-217337

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Huntington, Ellsworth http://d-nb.info/gnd/117070092; Cushing, Sumner W.

Title:: Modern business geography

Place of publication:: New York [usw.]

Publisher:: World Book Company

Year of publication:: 1930

Scope:: VIII, 352 S.; Ill., graph. Darst.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part four. The field of consumption

Collection:: Economics Books

The United States as a Market 201 raise some raw silk, at least enough so that it would not have to import from these countries. Why the United States does not supply its own market for tea. Americans consume annually about $20,000,000 worth of tea, or about a pound per person. The case is ike that of raw silk. Cheap hand labor is needed not only to prune the tea bushes to a height of five feet or less, so that the leaves can be easily picked, but especially to pick the leaves and cure them over fires and in the sun. Hence the tea industry is confined to such places as India, China, Ceylon, and Japan, which not only have abundant moisture during long warm summers, but are long-settled regions of dense population. GOODS REQUIRING MORE SKILL THAN THE UNITED STATES HAS DEVELOPED The goods which the United States might make if sufficient skill were employed include many chemicals, drugs, dyes, and medicines bought from Germany before the World War. They also include beautiful silks from France, and fine woolens and cottons from England. The problem of chemicals. Germany’s advantage in the chemical industries, as we have seen, arose largely from her attention to chemi- cal education. It also depends partly on the fact that when a country once gets a good start, it is hard for others to overtake it. Notwith- standing the advantage which the World War gave to our industries, it is difficult to keep German goods from ousting the American product even in our own market. Why we import textiles. The fact that Americans who can afford them purchase silks from France and broadcloths and lawns from England does not arise from superior technical schools such as those which give Germany such an advantage in the chemical industries, but from skill developed in the school of experience. For centuries both France and England have devoted great energy to improving their machinery and their methods of treating textiles. The United States has been so busy in making its production as large as possible that it has paid relatively less attention to making the quality as high as possible. Nevertheless, the quality of our goods is improving. For instance, our manufactures of silk were six times as valuable in 1914 as in 1879, while our imports had increased scarcely 50 per cent. In the same period our manufactures of wool doubled in value, while the imports of woolen cloth diminished. Since the World War there have been still further changes of the same kind. In other words, we are learning to supply our own needs, even in the finer grades of cloth.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Modern business geography

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation