Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Agricultural relief (Pt. 4)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Agricultural relief (Pt. 4)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1831932415
Document type:
Multivolume work
Title:
Agricultural relief
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1831934515
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-232102
Document type:
Volume
Title:
Agricultural relief
Volume count:
Pt. 4
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
III S., S. 255 - 297
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Agricultural relief
  • Agricultural relief (Pt. 4)
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

Mr. KiLcorg. The farmers generally, not merely the members of ~~ 
cooperatives, read statements of that kind, and they have been 
numerous. They hear the talks that have been made. vo 
Mr. CLarkE. Let me interrupt you right there. Whether-it be 
a million or a thousand farmers, this represents really a sincere effort 
for cooperation, don’t you think so? 
Mr. KiLcore. Absolutely so. 
Mr. CrarkEe. This Haugen bill, if put into effect, is a compulsory 
poel bill, is it not? 
Mr. KiLcore. It is a compulsory surplus pooling bill. 
Mr. CrarkE. Now, do you believe if all of a particular commodity 
were compelled to be put into or placed in a pooling proposition where 
it made no difference as to whether a man were in or were not in 
cooperatives, that it would be an inducement or encouragement or 
any way help the movement of cooperation? Do you believe it 
would? If the Haugen bill were put in effect, what inducement 
would there be for any man to join a cooperative, to help us along in 
what you believe in, and I believe in, and the members of this com- 
mittee believe in—cooperation? 
Mr. Kircore. That is a very fine question. 
Mr. Crarke. I am hook, line, and sinker for cooperation, and am 
director in a little cooperative up in our State. 
Mr. AsweLL. It is not a very little one. 
Mr. Kirncore. I think it would do this: The MeNary-Haugen bill 
would be compulsory pooling of the surplus. That would get that 
out of the way. It would leave the cooperatives in a position to 
orderly market the crop of its members—the portion not surplus. 
Mr. AsweLL. Would he not pay the fee on all of it, not only the 
surplus? 
Mr. Kircore. He would pay the fee on his entire production. 
Mr. AsweLL. On all he produces? 
Mr. KiLcore. Absolutely; every man—they all pay. 
Mr. CLArRkE. In addition to the fee that all in the particular 
commodity would pay, would not he, in addition, be also supporting 
his own organization and be paying a tax for the cooperative move- 
ment itself? 
Mr. KiLcore. He would be paying the operating costs. Let me 
get 1t clear. I believe I understand you and I believe you are going 
to understand me. The surplus would be pooled through the use of 
the equalization fee paid by all the growers, proportionately, each on 
his production, as I stdte in here [referring to clipping from North 
Carolina Cotton Grower read above]. The equalization fee is equiv- 
alent to every man buying back and holding his own surplus. If he 
produced 100 bales of cotton, and 10 bales of that is surplus, the 
equalization fee would either buy that back or guarantee against any 
loss in buying it and carrying it until it is sold. All of the growers 
would pay alike the equalization fee to buy and pool the surplus; 
and we would call that compulsory because they had to pay the fee 
to handle the surplus. The member and the nonmember would be 
on the same footing; it would be just a question whether a coopera- 
tive could operate in such a way as to make it advantageous for a 
grower to be a member of the cooperative, or whether there would 
be greater advantage in staying out of the cooperative. As it has 
been in the last few years with cotton, the advantage has been against 
the cooperative member and in favor of the nonmember. 
AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
273 
Q
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Principes d’Économie Politique. Sirey, 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.