Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Agricultural relief (Pt. 6)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Agricultural relief (Pt. 6)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1831932415
Document type:
Multivolume work
Title:
Agricultural relief
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1831934884
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-232132
Document type:
Volume
Title:
Agricultural relief
Volume count:
Pt. 6
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
III S., S. 429 - 520
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Agricultural relief
  • Agricultural relief (Pt. 6)
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
145 
Mr. KiLGorE. Yes, sir. 
Mr. Fort. Now, then, the New Orleans Cotton Exchange price 
for spot cotton to-day is 18 cents. What will the merchant who buys 
the cotton from the farmer pay him to-day in cents? 
Mr. KiLGore. I am not sure that I am right clear on the New 
Orleans quotation, Mr. Fort. You would be right if the New Orleans 
quotation included the fee. 
Mr. Fort. Put it your own way. When the price in New Orleans 
is 18 cents for spot cotton, and your equalization fee— - 
Mr. KiLGore. I reckon you are right; it depends on how the New 
Orleans quotations are based. 
Mr. Forr (continuing). How much is the farmer going to get? 
Mr. Kivcore. I reckon you are right. 
Mr. Fort. He is going to get the price less the equalization fee? 
Mr. KiLcore. I am not trying to avoid you question. 
Mr. Fort. He is going to get 16 or 1614 cents. Now, that is where 
you think he is going to feel the equalization fee, is it not? 
Mr. KiLcore. Yes, sir. 
Mr. Fort. Do you think that is going to make for friendly feeling 
between the merchants and the form -~re 
Mr. KiLgore. I think it will dene... 
handled. 
Mr. WiLLiams. The farmer does not fall out because he has to 
pay freight on the stuff to market. 
Mr. KiLcore. No. 
Mr. WiLLiams. I do not want to interrupt your line of questioning. 
Of course, this fee will be paid, but it will be paid just like transporta- 
tion and the other charges, and the terminal market price will be 
less all these other charges. So it will not change the present market- 
ing conditions a particle. 
Mr. Fort. I appreciate that, and I was trying to get the doctor 
to say it. 
To get back where we were a minute or two ago, we were figuring 
on a stabilized price under either bill? 
Mr. KiLcorEe. Yes, sir. 
Mr. ForT (continuing). At approximate production cost to the 
average producer, and we have assumed that that average produc- 
tion cost is 17 cents, we will say. Then on the sample transaction 
we have been using, putting the equalization fee at one cent and 
one-half cent cost of transportation, and so much for storage, han- 
dling, and profit to the merchant. On 17-cent stabilization under the 
Haugen bill plan, the farmer is going to get 1514 cents net, is he not, 
the first year? 
Mr. KiLgore. The freight and those items are carried in the prices 
of cotton now. 
Mr. Fort. I appreciate that. I am bringing it down to cents and 
nothing else. He is going to get 1514 cents on 17-cent price the first 
year. 
Mr. KiLcore. I do not see any use of bringing freight and those 
things into a consideration of this kind, because it is there now. 
Mr. Fort. Well, we will say—— 
Mr. KiLgore. It would not be any different. 
Mr. Fort. Now, he would be getting 1614 cents; and then he would 
zet 1514, just the difference of 1 cent, plus perhaps some accounting 
very much on the way it is
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Agricultural Relief. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.