Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Agricultural relief (Pt. 7)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Agricultural relief (Pt. 7)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1831932415
Document type:
Multivolume work
Title:
Agricultural relief
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1831935066
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-232142
Document type:
Volume
Title:
Agricultural relief
Volume count:
Pt. 7
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1928
Scope:
III S., S. 521 - 590
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Agricultural relief
  • Agricultural relief (Pt. 7)
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
529 
Mr. CLarRkE. Purely psychological and not economic? 
Mr. KixcaeLOE. The point I tried a while ago: You said you 
were of the opinion that if this board was properly created and 
properly financed it would eventually be of assistance to the farmer. 
Mr. ANDERSON. Yes. 
Mr. KincHeLoE. And then, if I understood you, you undertook 
to draw somewhat of a comparison with the reserve board. The 
point I had in mind was this: Of course, the purpose of the Federal 
reserve act was to mobilize and stabilize and conserve credit? 
Mr. ANDERSON. Yes. 
Mr. KincueLok. I understand what you are trying to get at here, 
not to do that for the farmer so much as to take care of the surplus? 
Mr. AnpErsoN. That is true, but in the course of taking care of 
that surplus you are attempting one of two things, either to stabilize 
his price over a period of years by the orderly control and marketing 
of the surplus, or to stimulate that price above the level which that 
surplus will economically bring in the market. 
My objection to the whole procedure is that the theory upon which 
it has been predicated is the stimulation of the price to domestic 
consumers above the level which the economic relation of supply and 
demand would justify. 
Mr. KiNcHELOE. You answer, In response to a question by Mr. 
Andresen—and I want to say right here I am anxious to get your 
idea about it, because I am frank to say I have great respect for your 
opinions about these matters, because of your years of experience 
here and natural ability—you said in response to his question that 
you thought that a board with sufficient financing could be of assist- 
ance to the farmer. Of course, if I understand your position, you 
are against an equalization fee, as you have always been; I presume 
that 1s true? 
Mr. ANDERSON. Yes. 
Mr. KincaeLoE. Here is what is in my mind, when you eliminate 
the equalization fee, as I said in my speech, when I supported the 
bill, I do not know whether it is constitutional and my research as a 
lawyer found so few cases in any wise parallel to this proposition 
that I could not convince my own mind about it; and I am still not 
convinced but I resolved the doubt in favor of the farmer. But I am 
convinced of this fact, that if there is any virtue in the equalization 
fee at all that it will come nearer preventing overproduction than 
anything that has ever been offered. 
Now, what I wanted to ask you is that if you have this board and 
just simply give them -the funds to take care of the surplus, how in 
your opinion could they keep down overproduction in this country, 
when we have already raised a surplus of practically every basic 
product in the country? 
Mr. ANDERSON. You would not get complete stabilization over a 
period of years, that is, one price for a period of years. Your price 
level would have to move as it does now, depending upon supply and 
demand but fluctuation could be ironed out to some extent and 
abnormal surpluses prevented from unduly depressing the price. 
It makes a difference as to the point at which your stabilization 1s 
placed. It is one thing to stabilize your price on the basis of an 
economic level representing your present and prospective expectations 
as to the total world crop or vour total domestic crop, and quite
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Agricultural Relief. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.