Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter V. Tax administration
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

TAX ADMINISTRATION 
135 
years 1917 to 1920, inclusive. For taxes of 1921 lands 
represented almost 53% of the total real estate valuation. 
After 1921 there was a gradual decline in the proportion of 
the total attributable to lands, with the result that there 
was a 609, and 40%, distribution of total real estate between 
town lots and lands for taxes of 1929. 
The question might be raised whether the increase in the 
valuation of lands that was made in the assessments for 
taxes of 1921 was not excessive. In that year the valuation 
of lands was increased from about $734 million to slightly 
more than $1,767 million, or more than 1409, while the 
valuation of town lots was raised from approximately $1,138 
million to $1,581 million, or about 40%. Real estate assess- 
ments for taxes of 1921 were made as of June 1, 1920, when 
farm values were at a peak. Even after making allowance 
for this fact, it still appears questionable whether the much 
larger increase in the valuation of lands, as compared with 
other real estate and with property in general, was entirely 
justified. 
The total valuation of personal property reached a peak 
of $920 million for taxes of 1921, and, unlike real estate, the 
level of 1921 has not since been attained. For taxes of 1929 
personal property valuations amounted to only $632 million, 
the smallest for any year since 1921. Of the total, approxi- 
mately $88.5 million, or 14%, represented the value of live- 
stock as assessed for tax purposes. The most important 
personal property classification, judged on the basis of 
valuation, is that of money, notes, bonds, etc., which showed 
a total valuation of $149 million for taxes of 1929, or 23.6% 
of all personal property. Bank stock, the other important 
form of intangible property, was assessed at about $108 
million, or 13.89, of the total personal property valuation. 
The two groups, money, notes, bonds, etc., and bank stock 
accounted for 40.7%, of the total valuation of personal prop- 
erty, but for only 5.2% of the total valuation of all property 
as shown in Table 41. 
1 “Intangible property” or “intangibles” as used in this study refers to those 
forms of property which are representative in nature. The two important classi- 
fications included under this heading are bank stock and money, notes, bonds, etc. 
Tangible property, on the other hand, includes real estate, livestock, motor vehicles, 
farm machinery, etc.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.