Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter V. Tax administration
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

156 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
information that he desires, even with the utmost effort. 
Property cannot be readily assessed unless it is visible, and 
intangibles, with the exception of bank stock, which can be 
readily valued because of the publicity given to bank state- 
ments, do not fall within this category. The taxpayers in 
Missouri who do not report all of their intangibles are in the 
great majority, and it is highly probable that a large propor- 
tion of those owning taxable intangibles do not report any 
part of such property. 
Another important factor is the confiscatory aspect of 
general property tax rates when applied to income from in- 
tangibles. Joplin, for example, has a total tax rate on city 
property of approximately $4.00 per $100 of valuation. 
Assume that a resident of this city owns a taxable security 
yielding a return of 6%. If this security is returned for 
taxation, the taxes will amount to two thirds of the income, 
provided that it is assessed at full value. It is true that 
other forms of property are not assessed at full value, but 
nevertheless there is the legal right to assess the security at 
full value if it is returned. Under the circumstances it is not 
surprising that such a security is not returned for taxation. 
Considering the confiscatory aspect of the rates, it is remark- 
able that the volume of intangibles returned for taxation is 
so large as it is. 
Another element of the problem involves the question of 
fractional assessments. Missouri assessors probably would 
be the first to admit that real estate assessments are not on a 
1009, basis. It requires, however, considerable imagination 
on the part of the assessor to value a dollar at less than a 
dollar. It is perhaps natural that intangibles reached for 
taxation should be assessed at a higher percentage of true 
value than is tangible property. 
A large amount of livestock in Missouri escapes taxation. 
In many cases it is doubtful if the assessor is able to make an 
accurate count. For example, if, when the assessor calls at 
a farm, cattle are at pasture a considerable distance from 
the farm buildings and cannot be seen without considerable 
delay, the easiest way is to accept the owner’s statement 
concerning the number and value of the cattle. The assessor 
receives a relatively small stipend per name on the assess-
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.