Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

TAX ADMINISTRATION 165 
comprises the tax base. The value of the shares is assessed 
to the individual shareholders, but the tax is paid by the 
bank. Except to the extent that the bank may be able to 
increase its real estate deduction by an amount in excess of 
its book value, the tax is equivalent to a tax on the assets of 
the bank, other than the real estate, that are not offset by 
liabilities other than the capital liabilities, including surplus 
and undivided profits. If the real estate deduction is equiva- 
lent to the book value, the result is a 1009, assessment of the 
book value of the stock less the real estate, which is separately 
raxed. 
This method of taxing banks is open to objection, aside 
from the fact that other forms of property are not assessed 
at full value. The larger the surplus, the larger will be the 
taxes assessed against the stock of the bank. Also, the larger 
‘he value of the real estate, the smaller will be the amount of 
taxes, for real estate is not ordinarily assessed at full value. 
The present method of taxation thus furnishes an inducement 
for a bank to keep its surplus low and its real estate invest- 
ment relatively high, in order to reduce taxes to a minimum. 
A surplus of considerable size is most desirable as a buffer for 
the protection of depositors, while an unusually large real 
sstate investment is not generally to be desired. 
It is the 1009, assessment feature, however, that has 
aroused the most opposition. Bank statements are matters 
of public information, and the bank has no means by which 
it can “window-dress” its statement for purposes of taxation. 
In the face of much lower assessments for other forms of 
property it can hardly be contended that the 100% assess- 
ment of bank stock is equitable. In several cases, the bankers 
have contended for a 75%, assessment as a compromise. 
Although 75%, is higher than the assessment ratio for prop- 
erty in general, the bankers probably gauged the situation 
correctly in proceeding on the assumption that the most that 
could be hoped for was a moderate reduction of the assess- 
ment ratio and not an immediate reduction to the average 
level at which property throughout the state is assessed. 
In the Boonville National Bank! case, the bank contended 
that the action of the assessor in assessing bank stock at 
1 Boonville National Bank v. Schlotzhauer, 317 Mo. 1298.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.