Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

THE FARM TAX PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 221 
TasLe 72: Taxes AND VALUE oF OWNER-OPERATED 
Farms ror wHICH TAXES WERE REPORTED, BY STATES, 
1924 (continued) 
Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 172 
Computed by National Industrial Conference Board 
Geographical Group 
State 
South Atlantic. ..... . -.... 
Delaware. ......vvnn 
Maryland. .......... 
District of Columbia . 
Virginia. .....0000es 
West Virginia. ...... 
North Carolina. ..... 
South Carolina. ..... 
Georgia. .......couovns’ 
Florida. ............ 
East South Central. ......... 
Kentucky........... 
Tennessee. .........- 
Alabama............ 
Mississippi. ........- 
West South Central. ......... 
Arkansas. .......... 
Louisiana. .......... 
Oklahoma. ......... 
Texas. ...c o0vnnvns 
Mountain. ........coeeeenans 
Montana. .......... 
[daho.............. 
Wyoming. .......... 
Colorado. .......... 
New Mexico. ....... 
ArIZONA. cv vev nnn nns 
Utah... ..ooant 
Nevada... . Cees 
Washington. ..... .. 
Oregon. ........ .. 
California. . 
Value of 
Lands and 
Buildings 
in Thousand 
Dollars 
$2,230,891 
27,028 
178.803 
1.177 
587,064 
230,452 
196,061 
179,666 
250,882 
279,758 
227.206 
452.570 
149,228 
168.286 
(57,122 
667,607 
213,348 
133,572 
289,426 
031.261 
877,040 
149,117 
184,093 
50,354 
225.879 
51,071 
52,296 
125.527 
38,703 
2,303,108 
351,722 
207,459 
743.927 
Laxes Re- 
ported on 
farm Land 
and Build- 
ings in 
Thousand 
Dollars 
Taxes per 
£100 of 
Value 
$21,811 $0.98 
273 1.01 
2183| 120 
161 1.36 
$213, 72 | 
782] 11 
5635 . 1.14 
L767, 98 
sooo! 120 
L982 71 
4863 1.21 
1950; 1.09 
50331 12 
1,749] 04 
ni31) 99 
7.623: 1.06 
2,550] 1.20 
2065 1.55 
£465 1.54 
8,543 .83 
11,872 1.35 
18820 1.26 
26801 1.46 
497. 99 
3,296. L146 
600) 1.17 
744 42 
1,745 39 
48 
33363 
4 
a 
R44 
if 
index 
Numbers 
United 
States = 
100 
50.0 
82.8 
98.4 
111.5 
59.0 
99.2 
93.4 
80.3 
98.4 
58.2 | 
99.2 
89.3 
91.8 
85.2 
163.1 
86.9 
98.4 
127.0 
126.2 
68.0 
110.7 
103.3 
119.7 
81.1 
119.7 
95.9 
116.4 
113.9 
91.0 
90.2 
1123 
Dar 
Index 
Numbers 
Group= 
100 
100.0 
103.1 
122.4 
138.8 
73.5 
123.5 
116.3 
100.0 
122.4 
72.4 
100.0 
90.1 
92.6 
86.0 
164.5 
100.0 
113.2 
146.2 
145.3 
78.3 
100.0 
93.3 
108.1 
73.3 
108.1 
86.7 
105.2 
103.0 
82.2 
100.0 
126.4 
112.7 
93.6 
cluded in the sample for each state. The figure for Missouri 
as computed is $0.78 per $100, which is a tax rate on true 
value as reported by the farmer to the United States De- 
partment of Agriculture. That this rate is fairly representa- 
tive of the state as a whole can easily be demonstrated. On 
the basis of the assessment ratio of 58% as shown in Table 
51, a rate of $0.78 per $100 of true value would be equivalent 
1See p. 174.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.