Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter I. State and local expenditures
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

16 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
Minnesota, Illinois, and Ohio. The net expenditures of 
Minnesota were 3.29, larger than those of Missouri; of Illi- 
nois, 86.7% larger; and of Ohio, 11.2%, larger. 
The ratios of the expenditures of the eight other states to 
those of Missouri are presented in the last column of Table 3. 
These ratios show that the net expenditures of Missouri for 
the six-year period were considerably more than the com- 
bined net expenditures of Kansas and Nebraska. The same 
is true of the combined expenditutes of Oklahoma and 
Arkansas and of other combinations of two states. 
Probably the most significant comparison on the basis of 
the data in Table 3 is between the capital expenditures of the 
several states and those of Missouri for the six-year period. 
Only one state, Illinois, had larger capital expenditures than 
Missouri, and none of the other states expended 75% as 
much for capital purposes. The capital expenditures of 
Ohio, a state having a much larger population and greater 
wealth, were only a little more than three fifths as large as 
those of Missouri. The capital ratios in Table 3 are highly 
instructive and show conclusively that the capital expendi- 
tures of Missouri during the period were much larger than 
those of other states of comparable population and wealth. 
In Table 4 the maintenance, capital, and net total ex- 
penditures of the several states are presented on a per 
capita basis. In 1928 the net expenditures of Missouri 
amounted to $10.76 per capita, a smaller amount than for 
any other state in the group except Ohio. Minnesota showed 
the highest per capita net expenditures, $18.95. In 1927 
the per capita net expenditures of Missouri were $12.21, 
while in 1925 and 1926 they were $14.40 and $13.79, respec- 
tively, and in those years the net expenditures of the state on 
a per capita basis were exceeded only by Minnesota. The 
decline in the figures for Missouri after 1925 is largely attrib- 
atable to the decrease in highway expenditures. 
Per capita expenditures in Missouri for maintenance in 
1928 amounted to $6.77, a smaller amount than in any state 
except Illinois. Although Missouri’s per capita expenditures 
for maintenance were higher in both 1923 and 1924 than in 
the later years, the difference was not great. The variations 
from year to year in Missouri have been much less than for
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Répertoire Des Administrateurs & Commissaires de Société, Des Banques, Banquiers et Agents de Change de France et de Belgique. 1926.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.