Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter I. State and local expenditures
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

22 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
a period of years provide a better basis for interpretation 
than do the data for individual years, since there are ordi- 
narily considerable variations from year to year. Considera- 
tion of the variations in the several states over a period of 
years might be valuable, but the summary data are to be pre- 
ferred for the present purposes. 
Table 6 shows that for the six-year period only Illinois 
expended a larger amount for highways than did Missouri. 
On the other hand, expenditures for education in five states 
exceeded those in Missouri! These five states and Iowa 
each expended a larger sum for social welfare. Missouri 
ranked fifth in expenditures for protection, fourth in those for 
general government, and seventh in those for economic de- 
velopment. 
The data in Table 6 form the basis for the derivative data 
in Table 7. This table shows that for the six-year period 
highways accounted for 47.39, of the net total expenditures 
of Missouri, a larger proportion than in any other state in 
the group. Likewise, the proportion of total capital ex- 
penditures attributable to highways was not exceeded by 
any state, and reference to Table 6 indicates that the pro- 
portion of highway expenditures for capital purposes was 
larger in Missouri than in any other state except Illinois. 
The predominance of highway expenditures in Missouri 
fiscal affairs during the period in question, which has been 
noted previously, is thus exhibited in a striking way by the 
comparative statistics of expenditures in Missouri and in 
other states. The figures indicate clearly that Missouri’s 
expenditures for highways, particularly those for capital pur- 
poses, were unusually large. 
The proportion of total Missouri expenditures assignable 
to the other functions, considered as a group, was smaller 
than in any other state, in consequence of the high proportion 
of highway expenditures in Missouri. One comparison that 
can be made may be significant. In relation to net total state 
expenditures, Missouri’s expenditures for social welfare were 
smaller than those of 8 other states? in the group, while 
Missouri’s capital expenditures for this purpose were rela- 
1 Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Wisconsin. 
2 Only Kansas. Arkansas, and Kentucky show a smaller proportion than Missouri.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.