Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

74 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
premium receipts for the ten series therefore amounted to 
$296,041. In other words, Missouri received $60,296,041 for 
the ten series, not counting the accumulated interest from 
the date borne by the bonds until the date of sale. This 
indicates that those responsible for determining the coupon 
rate of interest were successful in appraising the market 
situation. It was desirable that the bonds should be mar- 
keted at a rate that would preclude the possibility of a con- 
siderable net discount for the ten series as a unit, and this 
result was achieved. 
The maturity dates on the several series were adjusted in 
such a manner as to correlate with the estimated receipts for 
redemption purposes. The limitations contained in the 
constitutional amendment authorizing the indebtedness 
were, ofe course, observed. Table 24 indicates that the 
maturity dates for the ten series varied between Dec. 1, 
1923, and June 1, 1947, and that the maximum amount 
maturing on any one date is $3 million, as compared with a 
minimum of $500,000. It would probably be too much to 
expect that the entire issue could be redeemed without any 
refinancing, for this could occur only if the future financial 
situation had been perfectly appraised by those responsible 
for the determination of the maturity dates. Nevertheless, 
it is clear that every attempt was made to minimize the 
burden of the redemption payments required on any given 
date. 
Table 25 has been derived from the information given in 
Table 24. Since interest on the entire series is payable semi- 
annually, the semi-annual coupon rate and the semi-annual 
true rate are shown. The semi-annual true rate represents 
the interest cost for one half year expressed as a percentage 
of the receipts obtained! from the sale of bonds in a given 
series and based on the assumption that interest is normally 
payable semi-annually. In other words, this rate is a func- 
tion of the semi-annual coupon rate, the net receipts, and 
the maturity dates. The nominal annual true rate is ob- 
tained by multiplying the semi-annual rate by two. 
The annual effective coupon and true rates are slightly 
higher than the nominal rates. Itis a convention in actuarial 
1 Exclusive of accumulated interest between date of issue and date sold.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.