Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

¢ 
THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS 
The constitutional provisions concerning taxation are 
with few exceptions found in Article X.! Section 1 provides 
that “the taxing power may be exercised by the general 
assembly for State purposes, and by counties and other 
municipal corporations under authority granted to them by 
the General Assembly, for county and other corporate pur- 
poses.” The obvious implication of this section is that the 
power to tax is inherent in the general assembly or legisla- 
ture. This section, as construed by court decisions, does not 
grant the taxing power to the legislature. 
Section 2 provides that the general assembly shall have 
no power to surrender or suspend the power to tax corpora- 
tions and corporate property. 
Section 3 provides that taxes may be levied and collected 
for public purposes only. A second part of the same section 
contains the uniformity rule, that 1s, that “taxes shall be 
uniform upon the same class of subjects within the terri- 
torial limits of the authority levying the tax.” The intent 
of this provision is to prevent discrimination in any juris- 
diction among the taxpayers who are taxed on the same 
object of taxation. 
Section 4 provides that “all property subject to taxation 
shall be taxed in proportion to its value.” This provision 
imposes a definite restriction that precludes the possibility 
of levying special low-rate taxes on intangibles or levying 
taxes on the several classes of property at different rates. 
The provision that taxes must be in proportion to value 
has frequently been subjected to interpretation by the courts. 
In one case it was specifically pointed out that this section 
is not intended to secure equality of taxation throughout 
the state, but that it does require that taxes must be in pro- 
portion to values in the territory in which they are levied.” 
All that is required is that the property taxes raised by a 
given county, for example, shall be levied on all subjects 
forming a part of the taxable proverty in the countv ac- 
1 In the remainder of this section, Article X is not repeated. All section numbers 
refer to Article X unless otherwise noted. 
2 State ex rel. v. Field, 119 Mo. 593, 24 S. W. 752,
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.