Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

National origins provision of immigration law

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Identifikator:
1838857176
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-229226
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Thomson's manual of Pacific Northwest finance
Place of publication:
Seattle
Publisher:
Thomson's Statistical Service
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
XXX, 487 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Section VIII. Industrials
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • National origins provision of immigration law
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Wilbur J. Carr, assistant secretary, Department of State
  • Statement of Samuel W. Boggs, geographer, Department of State
  • Statement of Dr. Joseph A. Hill, assistant to the director of the census, Department of Commerce
  • Statement of hon. Robe Carl White, assistant secretary, Department of Labor
  • Statement of hon. Harry E. Hull, commissioner general of immigration, Department of Labor
  • Statement of Demarest Lloyd, representing delegation of patriotic societies, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Bell Gurnee, representing National Civic Federation, Women's Department
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary-general, representing the Sons of American Revolution
  • Statement of John B. Trevor, National Immigration Restriction Conference, New York City
  • Statement of Dr. Herbert Friedenwald, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of hon. B. carroll Reece, representative in congress from the State of Tennessee
  • Statement of col. John Thomas Taylor, representing the American Legion, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Edward R. lewis, chairman executive committee, Immigration Restriction Legislation, Chicago, Ill.
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary General Sons of American Revolution, 1227 Sixteenth Street, Washington, D.C. - resumed
  • Statement of Samuel A. Mathewson, University Club, New York City
  • Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States
  • Statement of Hon. John W. McCormack, representive in congress from the state of Massachusetts
  • Statement of J. Edward Cassidy, executive director United States Air Force Association, Washington , D.C.
  • Statement of Maj. Gist Blair, representing the military order of the World War, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Frances H. Kinnicutt, immigration restriction league, and allied patriotic society, New York City

Full text

138 NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 
be evidenced was a question of fact—I will put it that way. Some 
men, from the country’s viewpoint, can be better utilized at home than 
they could in actual service. 
To my way of thinking, briefly—and you gentlemen, I suppose, 
have heard this argument pro and con for years—while it is not a 
new subject, it naturally is a new subject to me down here, because 
this is my first experience in Congress, this present short session. 
How long it will be, of course, likewise is a question of fact. At least 
it will be for two years, if I survive that long. 
But this question appears to me to be incapable of practical ascer- 
tainment—the national origins clause. We have a very sound prin- 
ciple incorporated in the law now. While intended as a temporary 
provision, it seems to me that it might be well, if we are going to 
have a restrictive policy of approximately 164,000 a year, restricted 
maximum policy of 164,000 a year, that we should have definiteness 
as to its ascertainment; and 2 per cent of the 1890 foreign-born 
population is a basis where the quotas can be definitely and certainly 
ascertained. It is simply a mathematical problem. There is no un- 
certainty. We have our census records in good shape, so that the 
uncertainty as to the origin of our foreign-born in 1890 is reduced to 
a minimum, if there is any uncertainty at all. 
When we come to the generations which preceded that, and I 
know so far as I am concerned—and I go back at least two generations 
before that of Irish descent, though I am an American, that is my 
viewpoint; and I look at every other person as an American, no maf- 
ter what his descent may be—but when we start discussing the na- 
tional-origins clause we must remember we are trying to determine 
the origin, not of one generation, but of every generation of Ameri- 
cans and of every generation that contributed to build up the original 
13 Colonies. In other words, we are going back approximately 300 
years, and into this discussion are drawn the offsprings of immigrants 
of all countries during the entire period of our history, both as a col. 
ony and as a Federal Government; and there is the danger of it. It 
is an unnecessary, it seems to me it is an unwise question, to present 
to the American public. It does not seem to me to be practically 
necessary. i 
While the principle anunciated might be in theory correct, if 
capable of ascertainment, so that it would not be offensive to our 
various elements or our nationals as is declared in the national-origins 
clause, nevertheless in its practical operation it is bound to be offensive 
and discriminatory. Mark you, when I use the words “ offensive 
and discriminatory ” I want a distinction drawn as between the intent 
in the passage of that law and its practical operation. You and I 
might have the highest motives actuating us in voting for legislation, 
and yet later we might see in its practical operation it is offensve. 
So, there is a distinct difference between intent in the beginning and 
results which follow the operation of any law that we might have 
voted or fought for. 
I want to submit this item of evidence: In Pennsylvania in 1790 
it wag said that there was approximately 110,000 persons of German 
descent. Yet between 1740 and 1750 there came to Pennsylvania for 
any one of several years approximately 12,000 of immigrants. That 
is not my word. That is in the records of the hearings before the
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

National Origins Provision of Immigration Law. Gov. Pr. Off., 1929.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.