Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Monograph

Identifikator:
1850495947
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-233603
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Off.
Year of publication:
1931
Scope:
xviii, 580 S.
graph. Darst., Kt.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter XII. - The income of the industrial worker
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. - Introduction
  • Chapter II. - Migration and the factory worker
  • Chapter III. - The employment of the factory worker
  • Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
  • Chapter V. - Working conditions in factories
  • Chapter VI. - Seasonal factories
  • Chapter VII. - Unregulated factories
  • Chapter VIII. - Mines
  • Chapter IX. - Railways
  • Chapter X. - Railways - continued
  • Chapter XI. - Transport services and public works
  • Chapter XII. - The income of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XIII. - Indebtedness
  • Chapter XIV. - Health and welfare of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XV. - Housing of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XVI. - Workmen's compensation
  • Chapter XVII. - Trade unions
  • Chapter XVIII. - Industrial disputes
  • Chapter XIX. - The planatations
  • Chapter XX. - Recruitment for Assam
  • Chapter XXI. - Wages on planatations
  • Chapter XXII. - Burma and India
  • Chapter XXIV. - Statistics and administration
  • Chapter XXV. - Labour and the constitution

Full text

218 
CHAPTER XII. 
caused, fines have an irritating effect on the worker and create a sense 
of injustice. In the case of the other compulsory deductions, the work- 
er usually pays for something definite ; but even here experience 
elsewhere shows that protection is necessary to ensure that the 
deductions are made for a legitimate purpose and that the worker 
secures in return commensurate benefits. The enquiries which were 
instituted in 1926 disclosed instances of deductions, such as compulsory 
contributions to charities selected by the employer, which appear to 
be wholly unjustified. Our conclusion, therefore, is that legislation is 
both necessary and desirable, and we proceed to consider separately 
the protection which the law should provide in regard to each of 
the three classes of deductions. 
Possibility of Abolishing Fines. 
Fines constitute the commonest form of deduction and the one 
which is most open to abuse, and there is some justification for the view 
that they should be made illegal. But the main purpose of fining, namely, 
the maintenance of efficiency and discipline, is legitimate, and if 
fines are abolished, other means must be employed for securing this end. 
[t is admitted that the fine, and particularly the harsh fine, does, at a cost, 
achieve its purpose; thus an employer, who abolished the system of 
deducting two days’ pay for one day’s absence, was subsequently faced 
with increased absenteeism. It is necessary, therefore, to consider the 
possible alternatives. One large company informed wus that it had 
practically eliminated fining, and we found on enquiry that the practice 
of suspension had taken its place. This was said to be less unpopular 
with the men as, unlike a fine, suspension does not enable the employer 
to obtain work for which he has not paid. It is probable, too, 
that, were suspension generally substituted for fining, punish- 
ments would be fewer and more carefully imposed. On the other 
hand, suspension involves loss for both worker and employer, for 
presumably the employer has to secure a less competent substitute 
or leave the work undone. Moreover, suspension would involve for 
the worker greater hardship than a system of fines. Another alternative 
bas been adopted by some employers, namely, a system of marking, 
deducting marks for irregular attendance and other causes, and paying 
a bonus on the total marks obtained. This has the advantage of securing 
a definite irreducible wage to the worker and of minimising the possibility 
of arbitrary action, and its psychological effects are better in that it sub- 
stitutes for punishments what appear to be rewards. We fear, however, 
that if fines were abolished the bonus system might easily be developed 
into something almost indistinguishable from a system of fines. Finally, 
there is the possibility of dismissal or of the threat of dismissal for 
repeated offences. The main argument always adduced in favour of 
fines is that the worker would rather be fined than dismissed. As 
a rule this is true, but the argument is not as strong as 
it looks, for employers would not dismiss all the men who are 
now fined. Even if inefficient or lazy men were dismissed more fre- 
nuently than at present. the effect might be oood. for there would be a
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. His Majesty’s Stationery Off., 1931.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.