Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Monograph

Identifikator:
1850495947
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-233603
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Off.
Year of publication:
1931
Scope:
xviii, 580 S.
graph. Darst., Kt.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter XXV. - Labour and the constitution
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. - Introduction
  • Chapter II. - Migration and the factory worker
  • Chapter III. - The employment of the factory worker
  • Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
  • Chapter V. - Working conditions in factories
  • Chapter VI. - Seasonal factories
  • Chapter VII. - Unregulated factories
  • Chapter VIII. - Mines
  • Chapter IX. - Railways
  • Chapter X. - Railways - continued
  • Chapter XI. - Transport services and public works
  • Chapter XII. - The income of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XIII. - Indebtedness
  • Chapter XIV. - Health and welfare of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XV. - Housing of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XVI. - Workmen's compensation
  • Chapter XVII. - Trade unions
  • Chapter XVIII. - Industrial disputes
  • Chapter XIX. - The planatations
  • Chapter XX. - Recruitment for Assam
  • Chapter XXI. - Wages on planatations
  • Chapter XXII. - Burma and India
  • Chapter XXIV. - Statistics and administration
  • Chapter XXV. - Labour and the constitution

Full text

488 OBSERVATIONS ON SIR VICTOR SASSOON’S MINUTE, 
definite recommendations. We have so acted because we conceived this 
to be the purpose for which we were appointed and out of a desire to 
avoid unnecessary public expenditure. 
On the question of hours in factories, Sir Victor Sassoon mis- 
conceives our argument. He deals throughout with the effect of a 
reduction of hours on the industry, but in the sentences he cites as the 
“ kernel ” of our argument we are dealing with the effect on the opera- 
tive; on the other hand he makes no reference to the passage which 
immediately follows, which is related to the question he discusses. So 
tar as the operative is concerned, the kernel of our argument is tm the 
statement that “ a reasonable amount of spare time away from the fac- 
bory is indispensable for the building up of citizenship, for the develop- 
ment of life, as opposed to mere existence, and for the maintenance 
of physical efficiency ”. On this vital question our colleague offers no 
observations, 
So far as the effect of a reduction on the cotton mill industry 
is concerned, Sir Victor Sassoon’s argument appears to be directed 
against the contention that, if hours are reduced with the existing methods 
of work, the operative will give the same output. We have nowhere 
put forward such a contention, nor is it part of our argument. While 
we believe that, when a shorter day hasbeen in operation for some time, 
there should be a higher production per hour in many mills and there 
might be a higher total production in some, the increase that the industry 
may expect in this direction is probably small compared to that which 
might be secured by resorting to shifts and by altering the methods of work 
within the mills. The evidence our colleague adduces, which he himself 
admits is not conclusive even on the point which he is endeavouring 
bo establish, has no bearing on the possibility of demanding higher stand- 
ards of working, and, although it cites recent examples of shift working, 
it makes no reference to their financial effects. The conclusion which he 
reaches is expressed in the words “ I feel that I am on sure ground in 
stating that, where a mill is now run on efficient lines, a reduction of 
hours will inevitably lead to diminished production”, This statement 
appears to us to beg the whole question for two reasons. In the first 
place, a mill cannot be regarded as run on efficient lines unless a reason- 
able standard of efficiency is demanded not merely from the management 
but also from the operatives, and we doubt if Sir Victor Sassoon, who has 
himself been a pioneer of efficiency methods, would contend that this 
is true of any large number of mills. But apart from this, the statement 
appears to confuse a reduction of hours for the operative with a reduction 
of hours for the industry. It is only the former that we have advocated ; 
and in the very instances which our colleague cites, the mills, although 
they shortened the hours for the operatives on one or both shifts, secured a 
substantial increase in the total working hours. 
Our colleague, in suggesting that we have fallen into a psychologi- 
cal error, states that “the chief difficulty lies in the complications caused 
by the differing climatic conditions in this country ” and suggests that 
“ hours of work which might appear unendurable in one province might be
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. His Majesty’s Stationery Off., 1931.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.