Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Monograph

Identifikator:
1850495947
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-233603
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Off.
Year of publication:
1931
Scope:
xviii, 580 S.
graph. Darst., Kt.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. - Introduction
  • Chapter II. - Migration and the factory worker
  • Chapter III. - The employment of the factory worker
  • Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
  • Chapter V. - Working conditions in factories
  • Chapter VI. - Seasonal factories
  • Chapter VII. - Unregulated factories
  • Chapter VIII. - Mines
  • Chapter IX. - Railways
  • Chapter X. - Railways - continued
  • Chapter XI. - Transport services and public works
  • Chapter XII. - The income of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XIII. - Indebtedness
  • Chapter XIV. - Health and welfare of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XV. - Housing of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XVI. - Workmen's compensation
  • Chapter XVII. - Trade unions
  • Chapter XVIII. - Industrial disputes
  • Chapter XIX. - The planatations
  • Chapter XX. - Recruitment for Assam
  • Chapter XXI. - Wages on planatations
  • Chapter XXII. - Burma and India
  • Chapter XXIV. - Statistics and administration
  • Chapter XXV. - Labour and the constitution

Full text

HOURS IN FACTORIES. 
49 
a smaller compass, and the unauthorised intervals cut down. If this can 
be achieved to any large extent, the problem reduces itself to one of ad- 
justing the total hours for the machinery. Here some evidence is afford- 
ed by past history. When the Factory Labour Commission of 1908 made 
its investigations, many textile mills were working from 13 to 15 hours a 
day with a single set of workers, and shortly before that this practice had 
been fairly general. There was ample evidence that loitering was asso- 
ciated with long hours, and the Commission considered that the operatives, 
by their leisurely mode of work, counteracted to a considerable extent 
the evil results which would naturally follow from excessive hours. 
In 1911 & statutory limit of 12 hours per day was introduced in 
textile mills. There'is no doubt that the general reduction of hours to 
this limit was profitable, and no one would now expect to gain by working 
operatives for 14 hours a day ; even at that time it was recognised by 
many as unprofitable. As we have already stated, the statutory 60 
hour week dates from 1922, but a 10 hour day in cotton mills had been 
secured shortly before that date. Opinions differ regarding the effect of the 
second reduction and these opinions reflect differing experience. We do 
not doubt that a number of mills were able to secure creased efficiency 
from the operative to an extent which more than compensated them for 
the loss of working time, and that in others there was in certain processes 
a distinct fall in production. Indeed, it is not difficult to show that the 
production of the average cotton mill operative in British India fell 
immediately after the introduction of the 10 hour day (though not in 
proportion to the reduction of hours) and that in a few years it had risen 
to a higher figure than that Prevailing before the change. This, however, 
is not the same thing as proving that the Operatives’ efficiency, by itself, 
increased to such an extent that they gave more to the industry in 10 
hours than they had Previously done in 12. There have been many 
factors at work, from unimportant ones like the substitution of adults for 
children to more important one such as expenditure on improved plant, 
machinery, cooling-systems, ete., and changes in types of cotton used and 
counts spun. We are pot, Prepared, therefore, to give any quantitative 
estimate of the results of the change, particularly as these results varie 
widely from centre to Centre. But there can be little doubt that, follow- 
ing the change, on the average the efficiency of the operatives has risen 
substantially, The change also had some effect In stimulating employers 
to secure increased efficiency in other directions, 
The Outlook. 
The last 25 years, then, have seen a great reduction in nomi- 
nal hours, accompanied by a growth in the efficiency of the opera- 
tives and of the mills, It does not, follow that the effect of the reduc- 
bion from 12 hours to 10 will be repeated if a further reduction is 
made. As hours are lessened, a point must be reached at which, 
even if the industry can maintain production by employing shifts, 
the operatives cannot face a further reduction of earning capacity. But 
the evidence shows that this stage has not been reached and that.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. His Majesty’s Stationery Off., 1931.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.