Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India

Monograph

Identifikator:
1850495947
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-233603
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Off.
Year of publication:
1931
Scope:
xviii, 580 S.
graph. Darst., Kt.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. - Introduction
  • Chapter II. - Migration and the factory worker
  • Chapter III. - The employment of the factory worker
  • Chapter IV. - Hours in factories
  • Chapter V. - Working conditions in factories
  • Chapter VI. - Seasonal factories
  • Chapter VII. - Unregulated factories
  • Chapter VIII. - Mines
  • Chapter IX. - Railways
  • Chapter X. - Railways - continued
  • Chapter XI. - Transport services and public works
  • Chapter XII. - The income of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XIII. - Indebtedness
  • Chapter XIV. - Health and welfare of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XV. - Housing of the industrial worker
  • Chapter XVI. - Workmen's compensation
  • Chapter XVII. - Trade unions
  • Chapter XVIII. - Industrial disputes
  • Chapter XIX. - The planatations
  • Chapter XX. - Recruitment for Assam
  • Chapter XXI. - Wages on planatations
  • Chapter XXII. - Burma and India
  • Chapter XXIV. - Statistics and administration
  • Chapter XXV. - Labour and the constitution

Full text

8 
in. 
is 
al 
Ym 
re 
Se 
Le 
+- 
le 
16 
ve 
a 
of 
Hf 
is. 
he 
vb, 
er 
ad 
or 
‘he 
ng 
ve 
of 
118 - 
ie- 
be 
oh 
La 
‘he 
to 
“us 
We 
ap- 
ble 
the 
“he 
wy 
ves 
we 
we 
ND 
HOURS IN FACTORIES, 
45 
regain their old standard in any reasonably short period. From the point 
of view of industry, the employer is entitled to claim that, until the worker 
1s ready to approximate more nearly to Western standards of discipline, 
it is unreasonable to attempt an 8 hour day, and even an 8} hour 
day would involve an amount of dislocation that would be serious 
It may be possible. in the future, when efficiency has risen further, 
to go lower than 54 hours, But efficiency is not likely to be raised 
so surely by a sweeping reduction as by a smaller one, and there will be 
nothing to prevent a further reduction, if the results of the smaller change 
which we advocate Indicate that this is desirable. Finally, we believe 
that the 48 hour limit which some of our colleagues advocate could only 
be operative at present if great latitude was given in the matter of ex- 
emptions. In our view, the worker will be better protected by a limit 
which can only be relaxed in exceptional circumstances than by one to 
which many exceptions have to be attached. So far as the daily limit 
is concerned, we would fix this by statute at 10 hours. This will 
permit of working either six days of 9 hours each or five days of 10 
hours with a half holiday on the sixth, and will give some elasticity. 
We would allow factories working on continuous processes or supplying 
articles of necessity which have to he supplied every day a 56 hour week, 
subject to their giving the operative an average week of not more than 
54 hours and conforming, in respect of Kolidays, to the provisions we 
recommend later 
Views of Members Advocating a 48 Hour Week. 
Mr Cliff, Mr Joshi and Diwan Chaman Lall incline to the opinion 
that the facts, as disclosed during the tour, warrant a larger reduction of 
working hours than is recommended. They consider that climatic con- 
ditions alone, apart from other factors, dictate such a course. The con- 
binuance of the practice of allowing unauthorised intervals that are so 
striking a feature of the industries working long hours, and the attempts 
by employers to regulate these intervals are admissions that the worker 
cannot reasonably be expected to give sustained effort for such long 
periods as are permissible under the law. This is further borne out by 
the fact that, in the industries working a shorter day, the workers are 
expected to give and actually do give a much greater degree of continu- 
ous and sustained effort. It has also to be remembered that, of the 
organised industries, it is mainly in cotton textiles that the worker is 
required to work for the full statutory week of 60 hours. Tt is in this 
industry, which is already protected by tariffs, that, probably not with- 
out cause, the charges and complaints against the worker of inattention 
and inefficiency are greatest. If regard be had to the atmospheric 
conditions under which cottoy, operatives work, then it must perforce be 
recognised that, on physical grounds alone, the need of the worker for a 
shorter working day is undoubted. This industry urgently requires a 
higher standard of efficiency, but it is scarcely reasonable for the employers 
to expect a higher standard, while at the same time they are requiring of 
the workers unreasonably long hours. The conditions existing in many
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. His Majesty’s Stationery Off., 1931.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.