Grundriss zum Studium der politischen Oekonomie: Nationalökonomie

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1847028748

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Conrad, Johannes http://d-nb.info/gnd/118521853

Title:: Grundriss zum Studium der politischen Oekonomie

Place of publication:: Jena

Publisher:: Fischer

Year of publication:: 1896-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1886436398

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-235143

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Conrad, Johannes http://d-nb.info/gnd/118521853

Title:: Nationalökonomie

Volume count:: Teil 1

Place of publication:: Jena

Publisher:: Fischer

Year of publication:: 1902

Scope:: XVI, 389 S.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Abschnitt I. Die Lehre von der Produktion

Collection:: Economics Books

STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES 115 years. In four of the years per capita state taxes in Ohio were smaller than in Missouri, but it should be remembered that in Ohio state taxes in 1926 and 1927 comprised a smaller proportion of combined state and local taxes than in anv other state of the United States. The General Property Tax Table 36 shows the general property tax receipts of the several state governments. In 1928 Missouri collected a smaller amount on account of the general property tax than any one of the states in the group, with the exception of Oklahoma and Arkansas. In the preceding year only Okla- homa and Ohio obtained less revenue from this source than did Missouri. The relationship between general property tax collections and total tax collections in the several states forms a more interesting basis for comparison than do absolute amounts. For example, in 1928 Missouri obtained a smaller proportion of total tax revenue from this source than any other state except Oklahoma, while in 1925 and 1926 the proportion for Missouri was smaller than for any other state except Ohio. In 1923, however, the proportion for Missouri was larger than for three other states, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Ohio. Of the group of states, only Oklahoma derived a larger pro- portion of the total tax receipts from this source in 1928 than in 1923. In a number of states, including Missouri, the relative decline between these years was very considerable. For example, the general property tax accounted for 70%, of the total state tax revenue in Arkansas in 1923, but only 29.6% in 1928. Per capita state general property taxes in Missouri are relatively small as compared with the other eleven states considered as a group. Only Oklahoma and Ohio showed smaller per capita collections from this source in 1928, and in all other states the per capita collections were much larger than in Missouri, the per capita collections varying between $2.52 for Arkansas and $7.95 for Nebraska, as compared with %1.79 for Missouri. 1 National Industrial Conference Board, Cost of Government in the United States, 1927-1928. pp. 74 f,

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Nationalökonomie (Teil 1)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation