Deutsche Geschichte: Tonkunst, Bildende Kunst, Dichtung, Weltanschauung

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1892063557

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015

Title:: Deutsche Geschichte

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Gaertner

Year of publication:: 1891-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1892073803

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236597

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015

Title:: Tonkunst, Bildende Kunst, Dichtung, Weltanschauung

Volume count:: E,1.1902

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Gaertner

Year of publication:: 1902

Scope:: XXI, 471 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Weltanschauung

Collection:: Economics Books

sHAP. I] THE CHURCH IN THE DOMINIONS 1425 was carved out of that of Toronto, and in 1862 the bishopric of Ontario was carved out of that of Huron, while a Bishop of Rupert’s Land was appointed in 1849, in each case with powers of jurisdiction. In 1856 an Act (c. 141) of the United Provinces of Canada authorized the bishops, clergy, and laity of the Church of Eng- land in the Canadas to meet in their several dioceses and to frame constitutions and make regulations for enforcing disci- pline in the Church for the appointment, dispossession, and deprivation or removal of any person bearing office therein, and for other matters, and to meet in synod to frame a constitution and regulations for the general management and good government of the Church. This Act was assented to and was subsequently explained and amended by a later Act of 1859, c. 139. Consequent on the passing of these Acts, at the request of the Canadian Church, a metropolitan was appointed by letters patent of 1860 and 1862, which gave him not only the power of presiding at their provincial councils, as desired by the Canadian Church, but large powers of suspending on certain occasions the local jurisdic- tion of the bishops, and exercising specific jurisdiction of his own in their dioceses. Complaints were made against his exercising this jurisdiction, and he was informed that it was illegal, and that his powers were subject to the Acts. In the case of New Zealand, originally included in the diocese of Australia, in 1841 a bishopric was created by letters patent with the usual jurisdiction. In 1856 and in 1858 four new bishoprics were carved out of the old one, but with powers of visitation only, the Bishop of New Zealand being given metropolitan jurisdiction. In Australia the see of Australia was constituted in 1836. In 1842 the bishopric of Tasmania was created with usual powers of jurisdiction? but as complaints had been made by Baptist ministers and Presbyterians, especially with regard to the * In the case of these appointments the grant of jurisdiction was clearly inadvertent. Power to visit only was given in the case of Montreal (1850) and British Columbia (1859), and in the new patent (1858) of Nova Scotia: see Parl. Pap., H. C. 476, 1866. Cf. also H. C. 276, 1855; 131, 1856, * Of. also the Law Officers’ opinion in Forsyth, op. cit., p. 52.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation