Fortschritt und Armut

Geschichte der volkswirtschaftlichen Lehrmeinungen

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1895264332

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Myers, Gustavus

Title:: Geschichte der großen amerikanischen Vermögen

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Fischer

Year of publication:: 1916 -

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1895266750

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-242184

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Myers, Gustavus http://d-nb.info/gnd/10190651X

Title:: Geschichte der großen amerikanischen Vermögen

Volume count:: Bd. 1

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Fischer

Year of publication:: 1916

Scope:: XL, 412 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Erster Teil: Die Verhältnisse in der Niederlassungs- und Kolonialzeit

Collection:: Economics Books

22G APPENDIX OF CASES. K. Note to Section 5 of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act, 1876. Touthill and another v. Douglas and others, 33 L. J. Q. B. 66.—Industrial and Provident Society; action; 15 & 16 Viet. c. 31; 25 <$• 26 Viet. c. 87; liability of trustees. The trustees of a provident society formed under 15 <£• 16 Viet. c. 31, but not registered under 25 4' 26 Viet. c. 87, cannot be sued in an action commenced after the passing of the latter Act, as the previous Act is absolutely repealed by it without any saving clause. Declaration dated the 30tli of December, 1862, that the plaintiffs sue James Douglas, John Baines, and Bobert Waterwath, as trustees of “ The York City and District Provident and Industrial Hour Mill Society,” according to the statutes in such case made and provided, for money payable by the said society to the plaintiffs for goods bar gained anti sold and sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the society, and for money found to be due by the society to the plaintiffs on account stated between the plaintiffs and the society. Demurrer and rejoinder. Kemplay, for the defendants.—This was not an action pending at the passing, on the 7th of August, 1862, of “The Industrial and Provident Societies Act, 1862,” 25 & 26 Yict. c. 87, and though the society was registered under the original Act of 1852, 15 & 16 Viet. c. 31, that Act and the amending Acts 17 & 18 Viet. c. 25, and 19 & 20 Viet, c. 40, are repealed by the 1st section of 25 and 26 Viet, c. 87, from the passing of that Act. So that although under sect. 2 of 17 & 18 Viet. c. 25, the society’s officers might and ought to have been sued (Burton v. Tannahill), on the passing of the Act of 1862 the society ceased to be a statutable society and became a mere partnership until registered under that Act, and so continues: the action ought to have been brought against all the members. Upon the repeal of the first two Acts, all the statutable machinery was gone.

Access restriction

Copyright

Metadata: The law of friendly societies, and industrial and provident societies, with the acts, observations thereon, forms of rules etc., reports of leading cases at length, and a copious index

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation