Responsible government in the Dominions: Responsible government in the Dominions

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1896933912

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794

Title:: Responsible government in the Dominions

Place of publication:: Oxford

Publisher:: Clarendon Press

Year of publication:: 1912-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1896935052

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-238139

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794

Title:: Responsible government in the Dominions

Volume count:: Vol. 2

Place of publication:: Oxford

Publisher:: Clarendon Pr.

Year of publication:: 1912

Scope:: XI Seiten, Seiten 570-1100

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part IV. The federations and the union // Chapter II. The commonwealth of Australia

Collection:: Economics Books

crap. 11] THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 879 (2) It shall not be necessary in any case, in order to appeal from a judgement of the Court of a state to the High Court, to obtain the leave of the Court appealed from.! Part VI.—EXCLUSIVE AND INVESTED JURISDICTION 38. The jurisdiction of the High Court shall be exclusive of the jurisdiction of the several Courts of the states in the following matters :— (a) Matters arising directly under any treaty ; 2 (b) Suits between states, or between persons suing or being sued on behalf of different states, or between a state and a person suing or being sued on behalf of another state ; * (¢) Suits by the Commonwealth, or any person suing on behalf of the Commonwealth, against a state, or any person being sued on behalf of a state ; (d) Suits by a state, or any person suing on behalf of a state, against the Commonwealth or any person being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth ; (¢) Matters in which a writ of mandamus or prohibition is sought against an officer of the Commonwealth or a federal Court.* 39. (1) The jurisdiction of the High Court in matters not mentioned in the last preceding section shall be exclusive of t Under the Orders in Council the Court itself can in any case give permission to appeal if it thinks fit. The State Parliaments cannot define :he conditions of appeal to the High Court as proposed in the New South Wales Criminal Appeal Bill, 1911 ; see Debates, 1911, p. 1384. * Cf. the older cases, ex parte Marks, 15 N. S. W. L. R. 179; ex parte Rouanet, ibid., 269 ; National Starch Manufacturing Co. v. Munn’s Patent Maizena Co., 13 N. 8S. W. L. R. Eq. 101, at p. 116: Quick and Garran, op. cit., p. 770. * The Crown in each state and in the Commonwealth becomes directly amenable to the Court, a curious result of federation, but clearly desirable ; but there is no new genus of jurisdiction in reality created, cf. Penn v. Baltimore, 1 Ves. Sen. 444. The cases could all have heen dealt with by the King in Council or the Courts. The Supreme Court of Canada has no such power save by concurrent dominion and provincial legislation. Cf. Enever v. The King, (1908) 3 C. L. R. 969; Baume v. The Common- wealth, 4 C. L. R. 97; Sargood Bros. v. The Commonwealth, 11 C. L. R. 258, at pp. 309, 310 per Higgins J.: Harrison Moore, op. cit., pp. 417-21, 191 seq. ' This was so held in ex parte Goldring, (1903) 3 S. R. (N. 8. W.) 260; seo also Ah Sheung v. Lindberg, (1906) V. L. R. 323, at p. 326; Harrison Moore, op. cit., pp. 400 seq.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation