Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896935311
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-237672
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 3
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
XII Seiten, Seiten 1102-1670
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part V. Imperial control over Dominion administration and legislation
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part V. Imperial control over Dominion administration and legislation
  • Part VI. The judiciary
  • Part VII. The Church in the dominions
  • Part VIII. Imperial unity and imperial co-operation
  • Index

Full text

OHAP. XI] HONOURS 
1311 
the Colonies by letters patent and conferring upon them 
jurisdiction of any kind was definitely and finally abandoned. 
[t was then clear that all bishops must be treated alike and 
denied precedence or accorded precedence on like grounds, but 
the new order was not established generally until the nineties. 
It has become the practice of late to vary the rule by 
which members of the Royal Family are given precedence 
next after the Governor of a Colony. Though this was 
observed on the occasion of early visits paid by royalty to the 
Colonies and to India, the Duke of York, when he visited 
Australia to open the Commonwealth Parliament in 1901, 
took precedence before the Governor-General. On the other 
hand, in New Zealand, which he also visited, he had not 
any such precedence. But on the occasion of the Prince of 
Wales’s visit to Canada in connexion with the Tercentenary 
celebrations in 1907, he was given by dispatch precedence 
over all persons in the Dominion of Canada, including the 
Governor-General, and when the Duke of Connaught was 
sent in 1910 to South Africa to open the first Parliament 
of the Union, he was likewise given precedence by letters 
patent over all persons in South Africa. 
The general regulation of precedence by statute has 
practically never taken place, but it has been regulated in 
the case of the Judges in Australia by the Royal Charters 
of Justice and local Acts. For example, the Royal Charter 
of Justice of 1823 for New South Wales, which was issued 
ander the statutory authority given by the Act 4 Geo. IV. 
¢. 96, gave the Chief Justice of New South Wales precedence 
immediately after the Governor of the state. This charter 
reserved full power to the Crown to repeal its provisions, but 
the Constitution Act of 1855 maintained the provisions of the 
existing Act subject to being altered by the authority which 
could change them. The precedence of the Chief Justice could 
thus be, and was on a vacancy in 1910 altered by instructions 
from the King 150 as to give the Admiral the usual precedence 
} * That a provision of a local Act could be repealed by the prerogative 
Is impossible, and so the Victoria Act, No. 1142 of 1890, s. 11, and the 
Tasmania Act, 19 Vict. No. 23, giving precedence to the Chief Justice next 
after the Lieutenant-Glovernor, and Puisne Judges next after the Chief
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.