Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896935311
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-237672
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 3
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
XII Seiten, Seiten 1102-1670
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part VI. The judiciary
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part V. Imperial control over Dominion administration and legislation
  • Part VI. The judiciary
  • Part VII. The Church in the dominions
  • Part VIII. Imperial unity and imperial co-operation
  • Index

Full text

CHAP. TI) ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION 1349 
>xercised by the Colonial Court of Admiralty, and no prize 
jurisdiction shall be exercised without special authority, 
which may however be given under the Prize Courts Act, 1894. 
Further, the Court has no jurisdiction to try under the Act 
any person for an offence punishable on indictment under 
the English law, and its powers as to the laws and regulations 
relative to the navy are to be those only which are conferred 
hy Order in Council. 
The legislature of the British possessions may declare any 
Courtof unlimited civil jurisdiction, whether original or appel- 
late in that possession, to bea Colonial Court of Admiralty, and 
may limit its jurisdiction territorially or otherwise, and may 
confer upon any inferior Court in the possessions such partial 
Admiralty jurisdiction as it thinks fit, provided always that 
any such law shall confer jurisdiction which is not by the 
Act of 1890 conferred upon a Colonial Court of Admiralty. 
All Colonial laws made in pursuance of the Act, or laws 
affecting the procedure in a Colonial Court of Admiralty in 
respect of the jurisdiction conferred by the Act, must either 
be reserved or contain a suspending clause, unless previously 
approved by the Crown! through a Secretary of State. 
The appeal from a judgement of any Court in a British 
possession in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by 
the Act after a decision of local appeal, lies to the Queen in 
Council, and the right of appeal can be granted in any case? 
and Orders in Council by the Queen or the Judicial Committee 
with regard to appeals shall be valid throughout all Her 
Majesty’s dominions. Rules of Court regulating the pro- 
sedure can be made by the same authority that makes rules 
for the ordinary procedure of the Court, but such rules must 
not relate to the slave trade, and can only come into opera- 
tion if approved by the King in Council, but when so 
approved shall have the same force as if thev were enacted 
As was the Canada Act (Revised Statutes, 1906, ¢. 141) regarding such 
jurisdiction in 1906. The Act, 54 & 55 Vict. c. 29, had a suspending clause. 
* Such an appeal lies from the Supreme Court of Canada as of right, 
Richeliew and Ontario Navigation Co. v. 8S. ¢ Cape Breton’, [19071A. C. 115; 
30 in the South Africa Act, 1909. s. 106.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fourth digit in the number series 987654321?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.