Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896935311
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-237672
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 3
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
XII Seiten, Seiten 1102-1670
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part VII. The Church in the dominions
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part V. Imperial control over Dominion administration and legislation
  • Part VI. The judiciary
  • Part VII. The Church in the dominions
  • Part VIII. Imperial unity and imperial co-operation
  • Index

Full text

cuap. 1] THE CHURCH IN THE DOMINIONS 1433 
decided by the Courts according to the agreement, or 
according to the legislative enactment. 
It is the more important that the real status and condition 
»f the Colonial Churches should be constantly present to the 
mind, because, as it appears to me, erroneous notions prevail 
bo a great extent on this subject. Some persons seem to 
imagine that they were founded and endowed in order that 
the association in each Colony should form a separate and 
independent Church. So far has this been carried that it 
seems to be supposed that, if the members of such Colonial 
Church, or a majority of them, should so think fit, they might, 
if dissatisfied with the person whom the Crown has appointed 
to be their bishop, withdraw from his superintendence and 
elect a bishop for themselves. 
That any number of persons, if they so pleased, might, 
though holding the doctrines of the Church of England, reject, 
either wholly or in part, the discipline and government of the 
Church, though they preserved still the creed, faith, and 
doctrines of the Church of England, is unquestionable. Such 
an association might elect their own bishop; they might 
divide the district in which they reside into sees, and elect 
a bishop for each ; they might parcel the district out into 
parishes and appoint a minister to officiate in each parish ; 
all this they might do, and all this would be perfectly legal, 
and all this would be binding on the members of the associa- 
tion who assented to it—as it is now in the Episcopal Church 
in Scotland, which is not, and by the Act of Union is pro- 
hibited from being, a part of the Church of England, and in 
which the Crown is prohibited from appointing or nominating 
any bishop. If dissensions arose amongst the members of 
such a Church, they must have recourse to the civil tribunals ; 
but when they did so the question would be tried by their 
own rules and ordinances, which would have to be proved 
by evidence in the usual manner. But this association would 
not be a branch of the Church of England, although it might 
call itself in union and full communion with it! By the law 
¢ Judged by this standard, the Australian churches would already have 
seased to be parts of the Church of England, and the judgement is incon- 
sistent here with Merriman v. Williams, 7 App. Cas. 484, which recognizes 
shat these differences in the election of bishops or the constitution of new 
soclesiastical tribunals in the Church of the Province of South Africa (see 
C. 979, pp. 36, 37) would not sever connexion with the Church of Eng- 
land, since these differences were unavoidable, but severance was effected 
by the rule (Art. I (3)) that the Church did not follow in matters of doc- 
trine the decisions of the English Courts.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Urtheile Der Deutschen Handelskammern Über Zollpolitik Und Handelsverträge. ‘Volks-Ztg’, 1892.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.