Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896935311
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-237672
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 3
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
XII Seiten, Seiten 1102-1670
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part VIII. Imperial unity and imperial co-operation
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part V. Imperial control over Dominion administration and legislation
  • Part VI. The judiciary
  • Part VII. The Church in the dominions
  • Part VIII. Imperial unity and imperial co-operation
  • Index

Full text

CHAP. 111] THE CONFERENCE OF 1911 1525 
North America Act, 1894, gave the Dominion Parliament 
full legislative powers, and that only a formal alteration of 
that Act would enable the powers to be overridden. In any 
event he wished the position cleared up. His views were 
reinforced by Mr. Brodeur,! who insisted that the Act of 1894 
had altered Canadian law.2 Mr. Buxton 3 insisted that the 
Act was merely intended to consolidate, and that any 
alteration was merely accidental. Besides, he expressed his 
readiness to meet the views of the Dominion by securing 
the royal approval to the proposal in a Bill of 1911 to 
validate as regards Canadian registered shipping the devia- 
tion between Canadian and British law. Mr. Fisher? finally 
decided not to vote for the motion, lest he be deemed to admit 
that the Commonwealth had not all the powers which it 
desired to have, but Sir J. Ward intimated pretty plainly 
that the Commonwealth was really no better off in this 
regard than the Dominion. Mr. Malan ¢ and General Botha 5 
also thought that matters were quite satisfactory, and that 
t Cd. 5745, p. 419. He admitted the binding force of the Act of 1894, 
! The reference seems to be to two facts: (a) s. 69 of the Imperial 
Merchant Shipping Act, 1906, altered the measurement of vessels for 
limitation of compensation by substituting for gross tonnage without 
deduction of engine-room space, registered tonnage plus the amount 
deducted for engine-room in arriving at the registered tonnage; (b) the Act 
of 1894 makes the effect of any breach of collision rules conclusive proof of 
default on the part of a vessel in collision, while the older Act of 1854, which 
was followed by Canadian law (first in 1880 by ¢. 29, and now in the Shipping 
det, 1906), made the breach of rules merely proof of default if the accident 
arose from the breach. Cf. China Merchants’ Steam Navigation Co. v. 
Bignold, 7 App. Cas. 512; The Khedive, 5 App. Cas. 486. In both cases it 
seems to me that the Canadian law was overridden, but it was a case where 
the Canadian law never had any validity as repugnant to 36 & 37 Vict. 
©. 85, 8. 17 (overlooked in 1880 by Canada). The saving in s. 421 of the 
Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, refers to collision rules, not to the rules 
regarding the effect of disregard of rules, and still less to the rules regard- 
ng limitation of liability which occur in a different part of the Imperial 
Act, though in the same part of the Canadian Act as the collision rules. 
It should be noted that the Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the 
validity of the Canadian Shipping Act, but the point of repugnancy was 
not taken in the case in question; see The Ship ‘ Cuba’ v. McMillan, 
26 S. C. R. 651; above p. 716, note 1. * Ibid., pp. 422, 423. 
4 Ibid., p. 423. % Ibid.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.