Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 832922498

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-79587

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

Place of publication:: [London]

Publisher:: [The House of Commons]

Year of publication:: 1871

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (XXIV, 242 S.)

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

134 APPENDIX TO HEPOliT FROM SELECT COMMITTEE Appendix, No. 8. the Earl of Aberdeen, Syud Saeed did mean that the nomination of his two sons was to the full sovereignty of the respective territories assigned to them. Viewed in connection with the appointment of governors by his predecessors, and what the position of his two sons was at the time, Khaled being then Governor of Zanzibar, and Thoweynee Governor of Muscat, which offices it was most probable they would hold at and after his death, Syud Saeed may have referred merely to such governorships, without designing, in any way, to interfere with the succession or supremacy to which the precedents of his pre decessors gave him no legitimate right to nominate, and which, after his death, might have devolved on either of his two sons, Khaled and Thow^eynee. 14. As having an inferential bearing on this point, I beg to notice here a passage from Colonel Rigby’s Letter, No. 46 of 1859, dated 14th April. He writes: “From his “ (Syud Saeed) having appointed his second son (Khaled) to inherit the African “ dominions, and his third son (Thoweynee) to succeed him in the Arabian possessions, “ it was evidently not the intention of his Highness that Zanzibar should be tributary “ to Muscat, but that the two states should be independent of each other.” The force of the argument thus adduced in favour of the independency of Zanzibar, on the ground of the seniority of Khaled, is entirely destroyed by Colonel Rigby himself, in his con tinuation of the foregoing quotation. He subjoins : “ The Prince Khaled was installed “ as ruler of the African dominions during his father’s absence at Muscat, and on his “ death, which occurred on 7th November 1854, his Highness passed over two of his “ sons, and appointed his fourth son. Prince Majeed, to succeed his deceased brother in “ the government of the African dominions, and it was proclaimed to all the Chief Arabs “ in open Durbar that he was to be regarded exactly in the same position as Prince “ Khaled had held.” Whereon I beg to remark that, as Syud Saeed, in this case, passed over two of his sons, and appointed Majeed to Zanzibar, leaving his elder brother, Thoweynee, at Muscat, the argument adduced in the former part of the above quotations in favour of the independency of Zanzibar, on the score of the seniority of Khaled, falls to the ground. 15. I come next to the will of the late Syud Saeed, a revised translation of which is given in Appendix C. This document, it appears, was found in a box belonging to Bint Seif, wife of his late Highness, one of the executors, who died at Zanzibar, and it subsequently came into the possession of her daughter Azza, residing at present at Muscat. The document bears the tokens of authenticity. 16. This will, as may be seen from the tenor of its several bequests, refers almost exclusively to the private property of the testator; and, although drawn up 10 years subsequent to the date of the late Syud Saeed’s letter to the Earl of Aberdeen, no intimation is contained therein of the arrangement which had been submitted to his Lordship. Had Syud Saeed deemed himself to possess the right of nominating a successor, or of dividing his territories by will, it seems hardly credible that he should have been so minute in disposing of his personal property, and yet have omitted all notice of his wishes in those other more important particulars. 17. The only public legacy bequeathed in the will under consideration, is that of two ships, “ to the Treasury of the Mussulmans.” I subjoin some remarks by the Rev. Mr. Badger on this subject:— “ The term ‘ Mussulmans,’ as here employed, is simply equivalent to that of ‘ subjects,’ “ or rather ‘citizens.’ It occurs frequently in the history of the Kings and Imams of “ Oman in that sense ; as, for example, ‘ the pious Mussulmans met together to delibe- “ ‘ rate,’ referring to the councils of the inhabitants of a town or district. The use of the “ designation owes its origin to the religious type of Mohammedan political administra- “ tion. The phrase ‘ Treasury of the Mussulmans ’ doubtless designates the public “ exchequer. It occurs in the following extract from the history just referred to : ‘ My “ ‘ father went to Sultan (who was then virtually the Imam), and said to him. My lord, “ ‘ I have examined to see whether Mohammed bin Khalfan has any houses or magazines “ ‘ belonging to him entered in the books of the kingdom ; but I find that he has not ; “ ‘ the houses and magazines which he had belong to the Treasury, and you are now “ ‘ master of the Treasury.’ ” 18. There can be no doubt, therefore, that the legacy under consideration was made to the public treasury. Only one such treasury is named, and from thence it may be argued, with some degree of plausibility, that at the time the bequest was made Syud Saeed only recognised one conjoined independent state. 19. The next point to be noticed is the claim adduced on behalf of Syud Saeed’s rio-ht to dispose of his African possessions by will on the ground that several of them wereliis by conquest, and that it was chiefly owing to his administration that the whole was con solidated into one dominion. 20. The able historical summary given by Colonel Rigby, in his letter already referred to, of the original settlement of the Arabs on the coast of Africa, and the subsequent extension, together with the conquest of Zanzibar and the adjacent islands, leaves nothing for me to add on that subject. His account coincides in the main with the native records comprised in the history of the Kings and Imams of Oman. Seif bin Sultan, according to the latter, at the opening of the 18th century, took Zanzibar, Mombasa, the Green Island (?), Kilwa, and other places on the coast of Africa from the Portuguese. These possessions

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation