Cost of living in German towns

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 866449027

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-93831

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Cost of living in German towns

Place of publication:: London

Publisher:: Stat. Off.

Year of publication:: 1908

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (LXI, 548 Seiten)

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

BERLIN. 21 Various forms and combinations of the back house have in course of time been evolved. The simplest and the original form is an extension of the front building on both sides to the rear by wings which are connected by a “cross” (quer) building running parallel with the street, so that a rectangular space is enclosed forming the courtyard or Hof. The building regulations, however, do not stipulate how architects shall dispose of the space behind the front house, and the latitude thus allowed to them has led to a diversity of practice. Sometimes a middle wing projects behind the front house, with open space on both sides, this wing leading to a cross-building ( Quergebäude ) extending the entire width of the plot. The back house may also take the form of an isolated lateral block surrounded on three sides by the courtyard, or instead of this “side building,” as it is called, there may be a “middle building” standing back on the boundary line with open space on either side. or in front. The semi-detached back house, whether a wing or a cross-building, is invariably entered from the courtyard by a separate door. The most notorious “ barrack ” house of Berlin, and the classic example ot a congested building site, is situated in the northern part of the city and bears the name Meyershof. It is a property consisting of a front house and five parallel buildings behind, divided by courtyards some 24 yards wide by 12 yards deep. Each of the back buildings is entered by two doors from its own court, and the uniform height is five stories with basements. The basements are still used as dwellings in some cases, but the great majority have gradually been diverted to business purposes. The entire property contains 250 dwellings, and in these dwellings are housed some 800 persons. The usual accommodation comprises either a large living and bedroom and a large kitchen, or a living and bedroom, an anteroom, and a small kitchen. Each tenant has also the right to a corner of the large attic. The dwellings are approached from corridors entered from small landings, and as a rule there are three dwellings to each corridor. The closets were formerly in the courtyards ; now a room on each corridor has been set apart for the purpose, and it serves for three households. There is little difference in the cubical capacity of the dwellings, whether consisting of one or two rooms and a kitchen, for the second living room has, as a rule, been formed by converting the large kitchen into two apartments. The usual dimensions are as follows :—Living and bedroom, 17 feet by 15 feet by 9 feet 3 inches high ; ante-room (often used as a second bedroom, though it is not heatable and has no arrangements for ventilation), 12 feet by 4 feet 6 inches by 9 feet 3 inches high ; kitchen, 12 feet by 6 feet by 9 feet 3 inches high. The rooms are papered, and if better lighted would wear a friendly aspect. The courtyards, on the other hand, are dismal in the extreme. No sun enters them, and as half the area is taken up with carts, coals, wood, and odd lumber, but a small space remains as a playground for the children. Meyershof is the largest individual property occupied entirely by working-class households, but houses consisting of four parallel blocks, with three intervening courtyards, each smaller, darker and duller than the other, are common. The rents in Meyershof range from £10 10s. to £12 per annum (equal to from 4s. to 4s. Id. per week, without rates), according to story, for a large room and a kitchen. Little can be said in favour of the courtyard system of building, much in disfavour, and that from various standpoints. It is merely a builder’s device for exploiting costly sites to the best monetary advantage, and it cannot be pretended that it ranks in the evolution of domestic architecture as an improved type. Nothing could be more depressing than the sight of the huge structures which surround many of the courtyards in working-class districts of Berlin. The street outside may be monotonous in the uniformity of its long rows of high buildings, each like the other in every detail of structure and external finish, yet it is wide and spacious, and the colouring of the inevitable stucco brightens the scene. Entering a typical courtyard, however, one finds oneself standing upon an arid piece of plaster, as a rule quite deserted. Looking around and above, the eye rests upon large expanses of wall and window rising to a height of five or six stories. There is no noise in the courtyard, for the convenience of 20 or 30 families requires absolute quiet, and the house regula tions are stringent upon the point : in most houses even the playing of children in the courtyard is expressly forbidden.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Cost of living in German towns

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation