Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Political economy

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Political economy

Monograph

Identifikator:
867647221
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-93157
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Chapman, Sydney John http://d-nb.info/gnd/123743141
Title:
Political economy
Place of publication:
London [u.a.]
Publisher:
Williams & Norgate [u.a.]
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (255 Seiten)
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Political economy
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

50 
POLITICAL ECONOMY 
buying other things with the twelve pence, 
namely 120 units. The clear loss is 90 units. 
Most psychologists (who are scientists 
devoted to the study of mental phenomena) 
would maintain that you cannot add the 
consumer's surplus of one person to the con 
sumer’s surplus of another person, because no 
relations subsist between the utilities enjoyed 
by different persons. There is no common 
denominator to connect my preference for 
golf, when the alternative is cricket, with the 
preference of somebody else for pictures as 
compared with statuary. Utility in economics, 
it is argued, should be regarded simply 
as an objective representation of the fact of 
choice and not as implying that a choice of 
mine can be brought into preferential relation 
ship with a choice expressed by anybody else. 
We must not assume that choice is measurable 
in units of utility that are the same for all. 
This consideration affords sure foothold for 
the opinion commonly held that price, while it 
measures the marginal utilities of things to one 
individual, does not measure marginal utilities 
as between different individuals. But, in 
support of this opinion, considerations can 
also be adduced from the utilitarian point 
of view which, given that point of view, 
are unassailable. Even were there such
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Political Economy. Williams & Norgate [u.a.], 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.