Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Industrial Revolution

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The Industrial Revolution

Monograph

Identifikator:
898818206
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-24712
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Flückiger, Otto
Title:
Die Schweiz
Place of publication:
Zürich
Publisher:
Druck und Verlag von Schultheß & Co
Year of publication:
1911
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (II, 265 Seiten, IV Blatt)
Digitisation:
2017
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Verkehrswege
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The Industrial Revolution
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

THE INFLUENCE OF COMMERCE ON INDUSTRY 497 
gradually and almost imperceptibly. The change from one A-D. 1689 
type of organisation to another does not necessarily involve 
any revolution that is apparent to the eye. The wage- 
earner, who is employed by a capitalist, may pursue his The vgn: ; 
occupation in the same sort of cottage and with the same industry on 
implements as those that are used by independent workmen. Hp 
The distinguishing feature of the capitalist, as contrasted be effected 
with the domestic, system lies in the fact, that under the ad 
former scheme, employers or undertakers own the materials? eh 
and pay the wages, whereas in the domestic system? the 
workman is his own master; he owns the materials on which 
he works and sells the product of his labour. But there 
need be no external mark that calls attention to an alteration 
in the economic status of the craftsman; indeed the same 
weaver might work for some weeks for an employer and at 
other times on his own account® On this account it is 
exceedingly difficult to follow out the course of the change. 
We can occasionally get definite and precise information on 
she point, but on the whole we are only able to infer the 
progress of capitalism from incidental occurrences. The tut traces 
nature of the difficulties and disputes, which arise in a trade, a ute 
may serve to show whether the labourers were wage-earners puis 
or not; and the character of the associations which existed of enae 
among them, may often give us a suggestion as to the con and trade 
dition of the workmen at some date®. It is, for the most disputes. 
| The employers sometimes owned the looms, as well, 2 and 3 P. and M. ec. 11. 
2 This term is used in the sense in which it was current in Yorkshire at the 
peginning of the nineteenth century (Reports, 1806, m1. 1038, printed pag. 444). 
Mr Unwin (Industrial Organisation, p. 4), defines the terms quite differently, and 
»pposes the gild to the domestic system, as separate and successive phases of 
levelopment, but this does not seem to me to apply in English history. I prefer 
lo say that the domestic system existed from the earliest times till it was superseded 
>y capitalism; the craft gilds were a form of industrial organisation which was 
appropriate to the domestic, rather than to the capitalist system; and that these 
gilds were convenient instruments for enforcing civic, as contrasted with national 
policy. 
8 The analogy with the agricultural change is noticeable; the yeoman farmer 
might often be employed as a labourer to work for a neighbour in return for wages. 
¢ The true craft gild was appropriate to the domestic system, but some of the 
mediaeval London companies were capitalist in character and so were the seven- 
teenth century companies, generally speaking. Trade Unions, as associations of 
wage-earners, testify by their existence to the severance of classes; the inference 
to be drawn from the formation of yeoman gilds is doubtful. See vol. 1. p. 443. 
5 Even in a great trade centre like London, the cloth-workers continued to be 
an association of domestic workers in the first half of the seventeenth century.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Industrial Revolution. The University Press, 1922.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.