PRIVATE PROPERTY IN LAND
105
In considering, therefore, a tax on land values, we must
bear in mind that it is a fundamental teaching of the Church that
the common good of all mankind is an end that must be kept in
view; that the community is the overlord of the landlord; that
every individual holds whatever land he possesses subject to
the high and supreme title of eminent domain.
“If I thus correctly interpret your aim and object, I do not
hesitate to say that your system of taxation is not condemned
by the Catholic Church, nor is it contrary to her ethical
teachings.” * )
To the foregoing there should be added the following
words of the Rev. Edward McGIynn in his statement
to the authorities of the Church of Romef regarding
what he broadly conceived to be the right of eminent
domain with deductions therefrom;
The organised community through civil government must
always maintain the dominion over those natural bounties, as
distinct from products of private industry, and from that
private possession of the land which is necessary for their
enjoyment.
The increasing need for public revenues with social advance
being a natural God-ordained need, there must be a right way
of raising them — some way that we can truly say is the way
intended by God. ... By a beautiful providence, that
may be truly called divine, since it is founded upon the nature
of things and the nature of man of which God is the creator,
a fund, constantly increasing with the capacities and needs of
society, is produced by the very growth of society itself, namely,
the rental value of the natural bounties of which society retains
dominion. The justice and the duty of appropriating this fund
to public uses is apparent in that it takes nothing from the
private property of individuals except what they will pay
willingly as an equivalent for a value produced by the com
munity, which they are permitted to enjoy. The fund thus
* Extract from an address by the Rev. Robert J. Johnson, Rector of the
Gate of Heaven Church, South Boston, at a reception and dinner given by the
Massachusetts Single Tax League to the Catholic Clergy of the Archdiocese
of Boston, December 3, 1900.
t for Dr. McGlynn’s complete statement as presented in Italian to Mgr.
S^atolli, December, 1892, together with English translation, see Appendix D.