260 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI
superintendent of schools in each county could prepare a map
of his county showing the present district lines and also
possible enlarged districts. The county superintendent could
also make available to the school authorities of the state
such information as he may have concerning the attitude in
the county towards consolidation and redistricting. With this
information, both the county superintendents and the state
school authorities would be in a position to further a redis-
tricting and consolidation program.
The most effective form of aid that the state can grant
appears to be aid in furtherance of the consolidation move-
ment. On’ the basis of the facts that have been presented,
the logical solution would seem to be financial assistance to
newly established consolidated districts and also certain
assistance to the smaller districts when for various reasons
consolidation is not feasible. The additional building aid to
consolidated districts recommended by the State Survey
Commission indicates a satisfactory approach to the problem,
and it is possible that by increasing the state grants on ac-
count of buildings displaced and the maintenance apportion-
ments to consolidated districts the consolidation program
could be pushed forward rapidly. The only other form of
additional aid that might be considered is aid to rural dis-
tricts that could not be fitted into the consolidation program.
Some of the present forms of state aid, as has been seen,
have undesirable features. If the state adopted an effective
central supervision of assessments, these objectionable fea-
tures would be eliminated in part. It is not considered good
business procedure to make a distribution of funds on a basis
that is not subject to control by the authority disbursing the
funds. This, however, is what Missouri has been doing in
granting state aid that in any way depends on assessed
valuation. If it were believed that the assessment procedure
would not be greatly improved in the near future, assessed
valuation should be eliminated as soon as possible as a basis
for the distribution of state funds.
State support of education on the basis of need probably
represents the only effective approach to the problem of
public school finance in Missouri. Examination of the
present distributions indicates that they are not necessarily