520 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [part IL
The dispatch is an extremely able one, and is a justification
of the conduct of the Governor which must be definitely
considered as more than adequately meeting the objections
raised to his conduct by the Secretary of State.
On the other hand, the Council sent home a long statement
in which they criticized seriously the Governor’s action, and
declared that he had been guilty of illegal conduct. They
said —
There are other circumstances in which a deviation from
the spirit of English precedents has tended to place the
Council at a disadvantage. Neither from the Governor, nor
the advisers of the Governor, has the Council hitherto
received proper consideration. This defect is probably
a consequence of the aggressive tendencies of the Legislative
Assembly ; but these tendencies have been stimulated and
not restrained by the action of the Executive. In England
the Crown has not hesitated, when occasion required, to
exert all its influence in order to restore and to maintain
harmony between the two Houses ;, and it has invariably
refused to lend its aid to either House to the detriment of the
other. In this country a different practice has occasionally
prevailed. Some Governors appear to have understood the
principles of responsible government to mean that they were
thereby deprived of all discretion, and were bound to permit
the Ministry of the day not only to use the whole power of
the prerogative, but to strain it, for the purpose of giving
sffect to the wishes of the Assembly against the Council.
The Assembly naturally retorted, and made savage attacks
upon the action of the Upper House, which it accused? of
having thrown out in twenty-two years more than eighty
Bills, and of amending more than twenty others so that
the Assembly preferred to drop them. It maintained state
aid to religion for fifteen years in opposition to the expressed
will of the country ; it mutilated till they were useless six
Bills for mining on private property ; it seven times threw
out Payment of Members ; it rejected an Electoral Bill and
a Tariff Bill passed by a large majority. It rejected four
Appropriation Bills and a Temporary Supply Bill. It threw
out a Bill to provide for the defence when invasion seemed
imminent. It rejected a Bill for an International Exhibition
Parl, Pap., LC. 2217, p. 55. # Ibid., p. 65.