s
the interalied debts.Without insisting on the succesive phases of this question,
which probably on account of inexact informations nearly took the shape of a
diplomatic conflict, to day after more than o year, has taken a more general cha
racter, the great American Republic, demanding from all its debitor States, the
settlement of this question, independently of reparations, we are also consequently
like France, Italy, Belgium, Tcheco-Slovakia and Yougoslavia etc. before a
situation, the necessity of studying the question in itself leading it to the
future to see how it is developed. This necessity is created by the negotiations o 1
each debitor State, even if they have not yet arrived at a practical solution and
also by the new attitude of, England, which by her note of June 1925 de
mands that the settlement of the American loans be effected at the same
time as hers, not admitting that we should pay one creditor without consider
ing the rights of the others. Thus we are placed in face of the following situa
tion: oh the one part the adjournment, the delay and the reduction of our rights,
and on the other part taking upon ourselves the Austro Hungarian debts,
the liberation quota, the value of transferred property, which establishes the
quantum of the claim against us under the treaties, and at last the settling of
the Interallied debts, for the American ones draw after them the payment of
the English debts and therefore of the French and Italian debts. From the state
ments made in the memoirs and the documents which we publish, the situa
tion before which we find ouselves can be summed up as follows.
1. In the reparation policy: our rights for damages owed to us by our
former enemies had been unjustly, against the terms of the treaty and without
our participation reduced to the Spa quota which was derisory when the
amount fixed for Germany to pay to the Allies for reparations amounts
to 132 miliards of Marks gold. The question is still open for us.
2. The restitution of our special claims : The notes of the Banca Generala
and the recovery of those ensueing from the anticipated enforcement of the
Treaty of Bnearest, has not been settled as it ought to have been done for a
privileged claim but even the mode of payment has not been fixed.
Roumania though a victorious country has remained with war damages
paid to the enemy, amounting to over 3 milliards gold, without receiving any
thing from them, this question is still open and we have an interest in demand
ing that it should be settled.
3. Although according to the Spa agreement, and by the different con
ferences and treaties, the determination of the Austro-Hungarian reparations
to which the quotas due to us were to be applied, had been decided, but to
this day, those sums, on which we could settle our balance, have not been
fixed, but even delays for paying them have been granted, That is, there
has been no general plan for carrying out the decisions, formed for the suc
ceeding states of Auslro-Hungary, as was done for Germany, by Dawe’s plan,
and nothing leads us to think that such a plan is being prepared. Rouma
nia demanded at the Paris Conference in Jan. 1925 the examination of the whole
situation, and she must persevere in demanding her right.
4. This delay, aqd continuation in establishing the obligations deriving