34
Damages
after the list
presented to
the C. 0. R.
milliards in fr.
gold
Claims allowed by Spa agreement
TOTAL
Proportion
Against Germany
132 mil. marks gold
Against Austria, Hun
gary, Bulgaria 12 mi
lliards
milliard
M. C.
"lobetween
damages
a claims
allowed (*)
°lo
| milliard M. C.
%
milliard M. C.
British Empire .
64.0
22%
29.0
H°/o
1.3
30.3
47.3»/ 0
France
218.5
52%
68.6
26%
3.1
71.7
32.8°,,
Italy
74.2
1QO/0
13.2
25%
3.0
16.2
23.1%
Belgium ....
36.5
8%
10.5
4%
0.4
10.9
29.8%
Servia
27.7
5%
6.5
10%
1.2
7.7
27.4°,„
Roumania . . .
31.1
i7o
1.3
1%
1.8
3.1
1.0%
By these figures we can see that while the percentage proportion between
the damages suffered and the claims allowed, varies for the other States from
23°/o to 47% Roumania gets the lowest quota of 10%. And we must not forget
that the figure of 31.1 milliards, from which we reckoned above, represents for
the Roumanian State only the damages suffered, and the issue of the "Ranca
Generala« notes, without adding the other special claims of Roumania’s and
the obligations imposed by treaties of Peace.
In the light of these figures, the Spa agreement and the quota granted to
Roumanian are eloquent enough.
The German payments on account of the reparations, after the quantum of
the war debt established at 132 milliards of marks gold, were hard to obtain. A
first moratorium was granted to Germany in 1922, and only the non acceptation
by the Reich of the conditions for a second moratorium which the allies were
willing to grant, obliged some of the allies to proceed to the application of the
sanctions, by the occupation of the Ruhr on January 11 th 1922, and the direct
recuperation of the right of the allies.
Towards the end of the year 1923, the Commission of reparations, applying
the provisions of article 234 of the Treaty of Versailles consented to reexamine
the question of German possibilites and to determine anew her deb t for reparations
To this intent, the Commission of Reparations, delegated, on November
30 th 1923, a commission of experts to study the question, and to refer. The
London Conference of July—August 1924, was called for settling the appli
cation of this plan by the interested Governments. (Annex 57).
The plan of the experts modified, and become now Dawe’s plan, puts
the question of the German reparations on another footing, fixing a new stage
in the evolution of the application of the treaties.
In fact, according to the treaty, Germany’s debt was fixed and global,
engaging all her resources, without any other right of interference for the
Commission of reparations, besides demanding the payment for the amounts
and in the prescribed delays.
Dawe’s plan destines certain ressources of Germany’s for paying the repa
rations, it imposes the forming of a budget, and constitutes organs which
within the German administration should assure the payments. In Dawe’s