A.D. 1776
—1850.
oy
capitalist
employers,
rome of
whom were
drawn
mercantile
business
and some
of whom
kad risen
from the
ranks
618
LAISSEZ FAIRE
cloth trade of the West of England ; but the moneyed men of
the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries had been merchants
rather than manufacturers of textile goods. It was only with
the progress of the industrial revolution that the wealthy em-
ployer of labour attained to anything like the social status
which had been accorded to successful merchants from time
immemorial. But the triumph of capital in industry involved
the rise and prosperity of a large number of captains of industry,
It seems probable that there was comparatively little
room for the intrusion of new men in the old centres of the
cloth trades. There were large and well-established houses
engaged in this manufacture in the West of England, and
they had an honourable ambition to maintain the traditions
of their trades. In Yorkshire, too, there was a class of
capitalist merchants who were ready to deflect their energies
into manufacturing as occasion arose. The wealthy em-
ployers of the West Riding seem to have been chiefly drawn
from this class. though they were doubtless reinforced to
some extent by men like Hirst who had risen from the ranks?
There is reason to believe, however, that in Lancashire, and
the other areas where the cotton trade was carried on, the
course of affairs was somewhat different. This industry was
characterised by an extraordinary expansion, and it offered
abundant opportunities for new men, of energy and per-
severance, to force their way to the front. “Few of the men
who entered the trade rich were successful. They trusted
too much to others—too little to themselves; whilst on the
contrary the men who prospered were raised by their own
efforts —commencing in a very humble way, generally from
exercising some handicraft, as clockmaking, hatting, &e., and
pushing their advance by a series of unceasing exertions,
having a very limited capital to begin with, or even none at
all, saving their own labour?” The yeomen farmers as a
class failed to seize the opportunities open to them; but a
“few of these men, shaking off their slothful habits, both of
1 For an admirable examination of the growth of this class see P. Mantoux, La
Révolution Industrielle, 376.
2 The Woollen Trade during the last Fifty Years, Brit. Mus, 10347. de. 25.
8 P. Gaskell, Artisans and Machinery, 83.